On 21/01/11 13:38, Frederik Ramm wrote:
Hi,
On 01/21/11 14:09, Rufus Pollock wrote:
3. The ODbL already supports the concept of compatible licenses. If CC
licenses do reach the point that they support data then this should
provide a way to interope (or even migrate) to that license if a
http://creativecommons.org/weblog/entry/26283
[...]
Simply licensing database rights, just like copyright, but only to the
extent they apply, just like copyright, is an option — but any option we
take will be taken very carefully.
[...]
(2) However, where CC0 is not desired for whatever
On 15/04/11 21:26, Andrew Maven wrote:
Is there such a thing as Attribution, NonCommercial, ShareAlike,
Unported, ODbL ?
Fortunately, no. ;-)
I'm looking for something that is
OPEN for Attribution and Share-Alike for Data/Databases
AND
PAID LICENSE for Commercial use
It's possible to use
Following on from a discussion on osm legal-discuss...
Having read the current CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 draft (and IANAL), I think SA
4's proposed database right copyleft clashes with the ODbL's:
http://wiki.creativecommons.org/4.0_Drafts
http://wiki.creativecommons.org/images/c/cc/4point0_draft_1.txt
