OK
I agree then. It is good design.
On Thu, 29 Oct 2020 at 14:40, Stephane Coillet-Matillon
wrote:
> Hi Zeljko, I think that like everywhere on-wiki things are
> consensus-based. If there is reasonable support and nobody has any strong
> objection it can be adopted.
>
>
> > Le 29 oct. 2020 à
Hi Zeljko, I think that like everywhere on-wiki things are consensus-based. If
there is reasonable support and nobody has any strong objection it can be
adopted.
> Le 29 oct. 2020 à 10:28, Željko Blaće a écrit :
>
> Hi! I just joined and therefore not sure if this or other UGs have any
>
Hi! I just joined and therefore not sure if this or other UGs have any
specific protocols to reach a decision together?
On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 8:28 AM Amirouche Boubekki
wrote:
>
> Great logo :)
>
> Le mer. 28 oct. 2020 à 20:44, Florence Devouard a écrit
> :
> >
> > Hello everyone !
> >
> >
>
Great logo :)
Le mer. 28 oct. 2020 à 20:44, Florence Devouard a écrit :
>
> Hello everyone !
>
>
> This is my privilege to suggest the adoption of a dedicated logo for our
> UserGroup :)
>
> We currently operate under the generic wikimedia logo for our UserGroup.
> A couple of weeks ago,
For what it's worth, I think it's really great. :)
Shani.
On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 at 9:44 PM Florence Devouard
wrote:
> Hello everyone !
>
>
> This is my privilege to suggest the adoption of a dedicated logo for our
> UserGroup :)
>
> We currently operate under the generic wikimedia logo for our
Hello everyone !
This is my privilege to suggest the adoption of a dedicated logo for our
UserGroup :)
We currently operate under the generic wikimedia logo for our UserGroup.
A couple of weeks ago, Stephane told me one of his team members
(user:Schlag88) would possibly have some free time