Re: Patch on unsupported AT command

2009-11-13 Thread Marcel Holtmann
Hi Yang, If some unsupported AT command is issued, different modem may have their own response. Now at my hand is a Huawei modem (EM770W), and it returns COMMAND NOT SUPPORT. In my case, this modem doesn't support AT+CGAUTO=0 in atmodem/gprs.c. Current oFono will hang there for it's

Re: ppp

2009-11-13 Thread Rémi Denis-Courmont
On Thu, 12 Nov 2009 19:39:40 + (GMT), Chris Pitchford of...@intrepid.cx wrote: I'm not sure if the requirements of ppp in the kernel have chagned, but couldn't something like this be repeated in this situation.. allowing pppd to speak to a local socket/fifo/pair of pipes that is terminated

Re: ppp

2009-11-13 Thread Chris Pitchford
Quoting Rémi Denis-Courmont r...@remlab.net: On Thu, 12 Nov 2009 19:39:40 + (GMT), Chris Pitchford of...@intrepid.cx wrote: I'm not sure if the requirements of ppp in the kernel have chagned, but couldn't something like this be repeated in this situation.. allowing pppd to speak to a

Re: Patch on unsupported AT command

2009-11-13 Thread Marcel Holtmann
Hi Denis, I think this might need a GAtChat quirk function where we can add extra terminator responses that will be recognized. And maybe even translated into something meaningful. Originally I had the terminators freely definable on the GAtChat + some hardcoded ones, but abandoned

Re: Patch on unsupported AT command

2009-11-13 Thread Denis Kenzior
Hi Marcel, Hi Denis, I think this might need a GAtChat quirk function where we can add extra terminator responses that will be recognized. And maybe even translated into something meaningful. Originally I had the terminators freely definable on the GAtChat + some hardcoded ones,