Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] gprs: Quectel EC21 does not understand AT+CPSB

2020-08-11 Thread Denis Kenzior
Hi Lars, On 8/11/20 6:42 AM, poesc...@lemonage.de wrote: From: Lars Poeschel The Quectel EC21 modem does not understand the AT+CPSB command, so aquire the current packet switched bearer from CGREG URC. --- drivers/atmodem/gprs.c | 32 ++-- 1 file changed, 30

Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] Add a vendor OFONO_VENDOR_QUECTEL_EC2X

2020-08-11 Thread Denis Kenzior
Hi Lars, On 8/11/20 6:42 AM, poesc...@lemonage.de wrote: From: Lars Poeschel The distinction between OFONO_VENDOR_QUECTEL and OFONO_VENDOR_QUECTEL_SERIAL does not suffice for EC21/EC25 in some places, so introduce and use a new vendor: OFONO_VENDOR_QUECTEL_EC2X --- drivers/atmodem/sim.c

[PATCH v2 1/3] Add a vendor OFONO_VENDOR_QUECTEL_EC2X

2020-08-11 Thread poeschel
From: Lars Poeschel The distinction between OFONO_VENDOR_QUECTEL and OFONO_VENDOR_QUECTEL_SERIAL does not suffice for EC21/EC25 in some places, so introduce and use a new vendor: OFONO_VENDOR_QUECTEL_EC2X --- drivers/atmodem/sim.c | 1 + drivers/atmodem/sms.c | 2 ++

[PATCH v2 2/3] atmodem: Get strength and tech the quectel way on EC21

2020-08-11 Thread poeschel
From: Lars Poeschel I had some trouble getting network strengh and access technology the standard way on Quectel EC21. It does work - but only kind of. I did not get URCs when I am sure I should. This way through CIEV, CIND and CMER is also not documented in Quectel documentation, so I suspect

[PATCH v2 3/3] gprs: Quectel EC21 does not understand AT+CPSB

2020-08-11 Thread poeschel
From: Lars Poeschel The Quectel EC21 modem does not understand the AT+CPSB command, so aquire the current packet switched bearer from CGREG URC. --- drivers/atmodem/gprs.c | 32 ++-- 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git

Re: [PATCH 1/5] Add a vendor OFONO_VENDOR_QUECTEL_EC2X

2020-08-11 Thread Lars Poeschel
On Fri, Aug 07, 2020 at 11:09:19AM -0500, Denis Kenzior wrote: > Hi Lars, > > On 8/4/20 7:38 AM, poesc...@lemonage.de wrote: > > From: Lars Poeschel > > > > The distinction between OFONO_VENDOR_QUECTEL and > > OFONO_VENDOR_QUECTEL_SERIAL does not suffice for EC21/EC25 in some > > places, so