Hi Jukka,
2011/1/24 Jukka Saunamaki jukka.saunam...@nokia.com:
Then how about something like this: Lets make provisioning API
synchronous (so that plugins do not need to care about SIM or other
safety).
In stead, if in gprs atom ofono_gprs_register() we notice the need for
provisioning,
Hi Denis,
2011/1/21 Denis Kenzior denk...@gmail.com:
How exactly are you guaranteeing that 'nothing bad should happen'?
There is no cancellation mechanism that I see. Not to mention that the
current ofono_sim_read API is not even safe either. For exactly the
same reasons.
This is a problem
Hi Jukka,
On 01/21/2011 01:39 AM, Jukka Saunamaki wrote:
Hi
On Thu, 2011-01-20 at 15:51 -0600, Denis Kenzior wrote:
So I don't really see the point in an asynchronous provisioning driver.
If you want to do this over D-Bus or something then you might as well
provision via the
---
Makefile.am |2 +-
include/gprs-provision.h | 74 ++
2 files changed, 75 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 include/gprs-provision.h
diff --git a/Makefile.am b/Makefile.am
index c1c34ca..7a03f08 100644
---
Hi Jukka,
+/*
+ * Callback from provisioning plugin.
+ */
+typedef void (*ofono_gprs_provision_cb_t)(
+ const struct ofono_gprs_provision_data settings[],
+ int count, void *user_data);
+
+struct ofono_gprs_provision_driver {
+ const char
Hi
On Thu, 2011-01-20 at 15:51 -0600, Denis Kenzior wrote:
So I don't really see the point in an asynchronous provisioning driver.
If you want to do this over D-Bus or something then you might as well
provision via the ConnectionManager interface. The other problem with
being async is that
