Hi Martin,
On 07/09/2019 01:50 AM, Martin Hundebøll wrote:
Hi Denis,
On 08/07/2019 18.12, Denis Kenzior wrote:
However, there is still the fundamental issue of not being able to
correlate the created ttys to the original one... If we can fix that
in the kernel, then a strong argument can be made to drop GAtMux
entirely. Which is actually what I would prefer as it would make
conversion to ell much easier.
Let's see how it goes:
https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1098922/
That looks quite reasonable, so hopefully it gets picked up soon.
It won't make it in until v5.4, so either we support both n_gsm and
gatmux, or we fall back to /dev/gsmtty1 as base if GSMIOC_GETBASE isn't
defined.
Nah, I don't think there is a need to support both if everyone is happy
to use the kernel multiplexer. Can we come up with some common place
where to put the kernel multiplexer setup? This is something that will
be relevant to more than quectel driver...
Something like atutil? .. Or maybe even ell? E.g. we need an equivalent
of g_at_mux_setup_gsm0710() and perhaps something that would open all
the DLCs requested?
E.g. something like:
mux_setup(GAtChat *master, n_dlcs, callback, userdata, destroy);
callback(size_t n_dlcs, GAtChat *dlcs, userdata)
Regards,
-Denis
___
ofono mailing list
ofono@ofono.org
https://lists.ofono.org/mailman/listinfo/ofono
