Hi Aki,
Hence the reason for my pointed questions. I'm a big proponent of
moving the PLMN database to the core, however this needs to work for
both ISI and AT modems.
Right, so you agree to this TODO item?
I agree in principle, I'm just worried about the feasibility. Ideally
I'd like us
Hi Denis,
2010/12/9 Denis Kenzior denk...@gmail.com:
The NITZ notification does indeed arrive unsolicited. However, no AT
modem that I know of reports the received NITZ name. This is only
reported via COPS. The best you can do is call COPS again after the
driver reports
Hi Denis,
2010/12/3 Denis Kenzior denk...@gmail.com:
Out of curiosity, how do you plan to support this on AT modems? I have
yet to see any AT modem report the NITZ network name via a proprietary
command.
Are you sure? In my experience, the NITZ name may be received moments
after
---
TODO | 10 ++
1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/TODO b/TODO
index 6cf7202..457c9a1 100644
--- a/TODO
+++ b/TODO
@@ -497,3 +497,13 @@ Miscellaneous
Priority: Medium
Complexity: C2
Owner: Sjur Br??ndeland sjur.brandel...@stericsson.com
+
+- Add
Hi Aki,
On 12/03/2010 08:02 AM, Aki Niemi wrote:
---
TODO | 10 ++
1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/TODO b/TODO
index 6cf7202..457c9a1 100644
--- a/TODO
+++ b/TODO
@@ -497,3 +497,13 @@ Miscellaneous
Priority: Medium
Complexity: C2
