Hi,
2009/8/10 Denis Kenzior denk...@gmail.com:
2009/8/5 Denis Kenzior denk...@gmail.com:
mw_set_indicator does the right thing, I missed this fact. But when a
mailbox number is set or received from network all clients get a
PropertyChanged and the new number can be retrieved from the
2009/8/12 Denis Kenzior denk...@gmail.com:
So there are two issues here:
- There is absolutely no standard data format for such vendor
commands. So
coming up with a higher level API that supports all modems might be tricky.
Agree, this might be a problem. And in the worst case,
2009/8/10 Denis Kenzior denk...@gmail.com:
It would make sense for the providers to resend the MWI information
everytime subscriber connects the network and then it would be less
problematic in case the information couldn't be written to SIM, but I
don't know if they ever do this.
Probably
Hi Aki,
2009/8/10 Denis Kenzior denk...@gmail.com:
It would make sense for the providers to resend the MWI information
everytime subscriber connects the network and then it would be less
problematic in case the information couldn't be written to SIM, but I
don't know if they ever do
2009/8/4 Denis Kenzior denk...@gmail.com:
I've pushed this patch and heavily customized it afterwards to simplify the
logic a bit. Can you check that it is still working as intended?
It is kind of working but one of the things simplified away is using
the D-Bus interface even without working
2009/8/5 Denis Kenzior denk...@gmail.com:
Sorry I don't quite follow. The mw_set_indicator function sets the value and
emits the signals regardless of whether the MWIS file could be written. Can
you explain some more?
For setting mailbox numbers, a working EF-MBDN is required since the only
Hi Andrew,
For setting mailbox numbers, a working EF-MBDN is required since the only
alternative would be to store them on the filesystem.
mw_set_indicator does the right thing, I missed this fact. But when a
mailbox number is set or received from network all clients get a
Hi,
I've pushed this patch and heavily customized it afterwards to simplify the
logic a bit. Can you check that it is still working as intended?
Writing of MBDN fields is still missing. Can you send another patch for this?
Also one fo writing of MSISDN records in SimManager would be good as
2009/7/31 Denis Kenzior denk...@gmail.com:
+ if (mw-messages[i] != value) {
+ mw-messages[i] = value;
+
+ if (!mw-pending)
+ mw-pending = g_timeout_add(0, mw_mwis_update, modem);
+
+ dbus_gsm_signal_property_changed(conn,
