Re: Unsalble cellular connection

Hi jupiter, On Fri, Aug 2, 2019 at 12:46 PM JH wrote: > > Hi Giacinto, thanks for your response. > > On 8/2/19, Giacinto Cifelli wrote: > > Hi jupiter, > > most likely the network dropped the context without signaling. > > What kind of modem is it? And would you know also the chipset? > > It is

Re: [PATCH] netreg, gprs: Use -1 as netreg status during init.

Hi Denis, Den fre 2 aug. 2019 kl 13:39 skrev Denis Kenzior : > Hi Richard, > > > > + gprs->netreg_status = -1; > > > gprs->used_pids = l_uintset_new(MAX_CONTEXTS); > > > > > > > Wouldn't changes to gprs.c be sufficient, without touching netreg.c? > > > > > > No

Re: [PATCH] netreg, gprs: Use -1 as netreg status during init.

Hi Denis, Den fre 2 aug. 2019 kl 13:04 skrev Denis Kenzior : > Hi Richard, > > On 8/1/19 6:48 AM, richard.rojf...@gmail.com wrote: > > From: Richard Röjfors > > > > Previously the valid "unknown" registration status was set > > during startup, but its a bit problematic for gprs. > > There might

Re: [PATCH] netreg, gprs: Use -1 as netreg status during init.

Hi Richard, > +     gprs->netreg_status = -1; >       gprs->used_pids = l_uintset_new(MAX_CONTEXTS); > Wouldn't changes to gprs.c be sufficient, without touching netreg.c? No unfortunately not. gprs reads the netreg status when it attaches to the atom. Which would be

Re: Unsalble cellular connection

Hi Giacinto, thanks for your response. On 8/2/19, Giacinto Cifelli wrote: > Hi jupiter, > most likely the network dropped the context without signaling. > What kind of modem is it? And would you know also the chipset? It is uBlox SARA-R4 chipset, did you mean it could be caused by weak LTE

Re: [PATCH] netreg, gprs: Use -1 as netreg status during init.

Hi Richard, On 8/1/19 6:48 AM, richard.rojf...@gmail.com wrote: From: Richard Röjfors Previously the valid "unknown" registration status was set during startup, but its a bit problematic for gprs. There might be cases where a LTE context is activated before netreg is finished updating its