This is the first time that I returned to reading some opensolaris list
messages in exactly a month and a day. And then, after 1 minute, I find this, I
don't grasp it ... :
>
> On 12/20/07 18:25, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> > "Garrett D'Amore" wrote:
> >
> >> As I said earlier: show your commitm
On 12/20/07 18:25, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> "Garrett D'Amore" wrote:
>
>> As I said earlier: show your commitment by deeds not words. The next
>> time I hear you complain about how you can't integrate star because Sun
>> is against you and no one will do the work, I'm going to add a filter so
"Garrett D'Amore" wrote:
> As I said earlier: show your commitment by deeds not words. The next
> time I hear you complain about how you can't integrate star because Sun
> is against you and no one will do the work, I'm going to add a filter so
> I never see mail from you again, and you'll th
Joep Vesseur wrote:
> On 12/20/07 18:25, Joerg Schilling wrote:
>
>> "Garrett D'Amore" wrote:
>>
>>
>>> As I said earlier: show your commitment by deeds not words. The next
>>> time I hear you complain about how you can't integrate star because Sun
>>> is against you and no one will do
Changing the subject as the ogiginal subject has no relation to the current
topic in the mail
Alan Coopersmith wrote:
> Joerg Schilling wrote:
> > It is Sun that is interested in the integration but it also Sun that tries
> > to prevent it now. I am prepared but there is some work I cannot d
Brian Utterback wrote:
> Joerg Schilling wrote:
>
>> The wish resulted in PSARC 2004/480 and I cannot understand why something
>> that
>> has been decided to be needed now has no people to work on. It seems that
>> there
>> is a problem in the way Sun is organized if this can happen.
>>
Joerg Schilling wrote:
>
> The wish resulted in PSARC 2004/480 and I cannot understand why something that
> has been decided to be needed now has no people to work on. It seems that
> there
> is a problem in the way Sun is organized if this can happen.
An approved PSARC case has nothing to do wi
