On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 5:21 PM, Ralph Versteegen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I think the whole idea of replacing the current format with a textual
> markup is a bit crazy because:
>
> 1) If game had to be decompiled and recompiled every time it was
> played, that would really blow out already to
2008/11/6 James Paige <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Wed, Nov 05, 2008 at 01:41:23PM -0500, Mike Caron wrote:
>> James Paige wrote:
>> >On Wed, Nov 05, 2008 at 12:03:28AM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >wrote:
>> >>pkmnfrk
>> >>2008-11-05 00:03:27 -0800 (Wed, 05 Nov 2008)
>> >>467
>> >>Breaking the ground
2008/11/6 James Paige <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I probably won't be able to make it to IRC, but save a log for me please
> (or post it on the list if nobody else shows up)
>
> ---
> James
The conduits of discussion are logged by the friendly CP surveillance
bot: http://www.castleparadox.com/logs/ohrd
I probably won't be able to make it to IRC, but save a log for me please
(or post it on the list if nobody else shows up)
---
James
On Thu, Nov 06, 2008 at 01:09:21AM +, Mike Caron wrote:
> Well, i'm going to be home about 11:30 EST. Want to meet on IRC to
> discuss it? I have an idea which
I should get around to unsubscribing sometime :)
On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 5:51 AM, James Paige <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 05, 2008 at 01:41:23PM -0500, Mike Caron wrote:
>> James Paige wrote:
>> >On Wed, Nov 05, 2008 at 12:03:28AM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >wrote:
>> >>pkmnfrk
>> >>2
Well, i'm going to be home about 11:30 EST. Want to meet on IRC to
discuss it? I have an idea which should satisfy everyone, and is too
long to type on a cell phone :)
On 11/5/08, James Paige <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 05, 2008 at 01:41:23PM -0500, Mike Caron wrote:
>> James Paige wr
On Wed, Nov 05, 2008 at 01:41:23PM -0500, Mike Caron wrote:
> James Paige wrote:
> >On Wed, Nov 05, 2008 at 12:03:28AM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >wrote:
> >>pkmnfrk
> >>2008-11-05 00:03:27 -0800 (Wed, 05 Nov 2008)
> >>467
> >>Breaking the ground on my XML idea. for the time being, I'm not hacking
James Paige wrote:
On Wed, Nov 05, 2008 at 12:03:28AM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
pkmnfrk
2008-11-05 00:03:27 -0800 (Wed, 05 Nov 2008)
467
Breaking the ground on my XML idea. for the time being, I'm not hacking the OHR directly.
Instead, I'm going to work on a separate "test" program.
The
YAML is the best, in my opinion. But then again I also use Ruby and
YAML is the main thing used in Ruby.
Also I think that XML does way too much for the OHRRPGCE to be
practical.
On Nov 5, 2008, at 10:11 AM, James Paige <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
On Wed, Nov 05, 2008 at 12:03:28AM -0800
On Wed, Nov 05, 2008 at 12:03:28AM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> pkmnfrk
> 2008-11-05 00:03:27 -0800 (Wed, 05 Nov 2008)
> 467
> Breaking the ground on my XML idea. for the time being, I'm not hacking the
> OHR directly. Instead, I'm going to work on a separate "test" program.
>
> The main rea
pkmnfrk
2008-11-05 00:03:27 -0800 (Wed, 05 Nov 2008)
467
Breaking the ground on my XML idea. for the time being, I'm not hacking the OHR
directly. Instead, I'm going to work on a separate "test" program.
The main reason is because using libxml adds three DLLs as dependencies, and
I'm going to tr
11 matches
Mail list logo
