Re: [oi-dev] error in pkg5 - from oi-prestable

2012-02-11 Thread Bayard Bell
I saw that bit, but I was hoping to get the publisher and package version, as well as the hg fingerprint. On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 10:06 AM, Jeppe Toustrup openindi...@tenzer.dkwrote: On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 10:12, Bayard Bell buffer.g.overf...@gmail.com wrote: I don't get this error with the

Re: [oi-dev] error in pkg5 - from oi-prestable

2012-02-11 Thread Igor Kozhukhov
If it is possible - I'd ilk to see 'pkg' in userland build environment and rebuild it with userland. -Igor From: Bayard Bell buffer.g.overf...@gmail.com Reply-To: OpenIndiana Developer mailing list oi-dev@openindiana.org Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2012 11:05:34 + To: OpenIndiana Developer mailing

Re: [oi-dev] error in pkg5 - from oi-prestable

2012-02-11 Thread Gordon Ross
There's also the difference that pkg is real source code, (right?) where most other things in userland are just build recipes. If I correctly understood the suggestion for a separate tools gate, then I think that sounds helpful. Gordon On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 9:03 AM, Bayard G. Bell

Re: [oi-dev] error in pkg5 - from oi-prestable

2012-02-11 Thread Alasdair Lumsden
On 11 Feb 2012, at 14:11, Gordon Ross wrote: There's also the difference that pkg is real source code, (right?) where most other things in userland are just build recipes. If I correctly understood the suggestion for a separate tools gate, then I think that sounds helpful. Well! There are

Re: [oi-dev] 1638 add a clean urxvt build to oi-build

2012-02-11 Thread Josef 'Jeff' Sipek
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 07:53:09PM +, Bayard Bell wrote: I know that jeffpc mentioned having a patch for issues with an earlier version, but it wasn't attached to the issue. I don't know, either, if it's still applicable to the recent version to which I've just upgraded. I trust that will

Re: [oi-dev] 1649 bring xclip into oi-build

2012-02-11 Thread Josef 'Jeff' Sipek
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 11:11:34PM +, Bayard Bell wrote: https://www.illumos.org/issues/1649 https://bitbucket.org/buffyg/oi-build/changeset/36d948ceb5c3 - OSOL vs. Illumos CDDL header - why are you using WS_TOP instead of '../..' that other components are using? - why all the commented

Re: [oi-dev] error in pkg5 - from oi-prestable

2012-02-11 Thread Lou Picciano
Bayard: That pkg is from /experimental: pkg:/package/pkg@0.5.11-0.151.1.1 Aside, should it now be considered 'good practice' to do an rebuild-index after all updates? Getting the performance degraded message - and generally inconsistent search results when rebuild is not done. - Original

Re: [oi-dev] error in pkg5 - from oi-prestable

2012-02-11 Thread Magnus
On Feb 11, 2012, at 9:19 AM, Alasdair Lumsden wrote: I quite liked the idea of having a single repo to check out to be able to build the whole OS - makes it much easier for people to get involved with OS development. But pkg is more specific to OpenIndiana than it is to Illumian, so

Re: [oi-dev] pre-built build zones

2012-02-11 Thread Magnus
On Feb 11, 2012, at 10:49 AM, Lou Picciano wrote: Yes, indeed, a pre-configured, ready-to-go build zone was part of my original hope for the Oi-build world. Perhaps naïve on my part, but with all the power of zone cloning/exporting/snapping - this always seemed to me a natural

[oi-dev] My FUSE presentation at SCALE last month

2012-02-11 Thread Gordon Ross
In case anyone would like to have a look, here are the slides from my presentation on FUSE with in-kernel meta-data caching at SCALE 10x last month. (Summary: doors based fuse is more efficient by a factor of almost 2:1) http://yalms.org/docs/fuse-scale-2011.pdf Here's the doors-based fuse

Re: [oi-dev] victims needed for 2030 illumos use of git could really use a newer git

2012-02-11 Thread Jake
I use it a bit at work. I'll test it for you as well. Jake On Feb 11, 2012, at 8:30 PM, Kris Shannon k...@shannon.id.au wrote: On 12 February 2012 00:53, Bayard G. Bell buffer.g.overf...@gmail.com wrote: I'm cleaning up some bits in response to an initial review from richlowe. As you'll