Hi,
On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 5:14 AM, Nick Zivkovic zivkovic.n...@gmail.comwrote:
Is it possible to get zones on an etherstub to communicate with the global
zone?
Yes, it's possible and I have it running since some time now.
I have a WinXP running in a virtualbox, which has assigned a vnic
Andrew M. Hettinger ahettin...@prominic.net wrote:
That said, I think what Nick was talking about was not a build failure, but
common issues IPS itself can have. I've seen a few (rare) times where it
will just spit out a call-stack. Haveing a goto page of potental problems
and
Any further thoughts on this, anyone?
On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 9:16 AM, Garrett D'Amore
garrett.dam...@dey-sys.comwrote:
Originally Alasdair indicated that he wanted OI to be part of the illumos
foundation, so this approach of earmarking the donation makes sense.
Note that in the future I hope
At Thu, 6 Sep 2012 11:54:31 -0700,
Deirdre Straughan wrote:
Any further thoughts on this, anyone?
[...]
Since you asked
While OI and Illumos should retain and nurture a collaborative
relationship, I also think OI should foster and maintain it's own
independence, as imho Illumos and
On Thu, 06 Sep 2012 13:27:02 -0600, Ken Gunderson kgund...@teamcool.net
wrote:
While OI and Illumos should retain and nurture a collaborative
relationship, I also think OI should foster and maintain it's own
independence, as imho Illumos and Nexenta have not always acted in
OI's best
Nick Zivkovic zivkovic.n...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 4:35 AM, Joerg Schilling
joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de wrote:
Andrew M. Hettinger ahettin...@prominic.net wrote:
That said, I think what Nick was talking about was not a build failure, but
common issues IPS itself
At Thu, 06 Sep 2012 15:31:21 -0400,
mag...@yonderway.com wrote:
On Thu, 06 Sep 2012 13:27:02 -0600, Ken Gunderson kgund...@teamcool.net
wrote:
While OI and Illumos should retain and nurture a collaborative
relationship, I also think OI should foster and maintain it's own
At Thu, 06 Sep 2012 15:57:13 -0400,
mag...@yonderway.com wrote:
On Thu, 06 Sep 2012 13:54:02 -0600, Ken Gunderson kgund...@teamcool.net
wrote:
The foundation doesn't necessarily need to govern anything. Indeed,
my preference is that it would not. Rather it just needs to be a
On Thu, 06 Sep 2012 14:15:48 -0600, Ken Gunderson kgund...@teamcool.net
wrote:
Doesn't need to be a C corp. Keep it simple. Maybe an LLC or S
corp?
Not if you want to accept tax-deductible donations.
The cliff's notes: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/501(c)
A 501(c)(3) may or may not be
At Thu, 06 Sep 2012 16:32:41 -0400,
mag...@yonderway.com wrote:
On Thu, 06 Sep 2012 14:15:48 -0600, Ken Gunderson kgund...@teamcool.net
wrote:
Doesn't need to be a C corp. Keep it simple. Maybe an LLC or S
corp?
Not if you want to accept tax-deductible donations.
The
I think this is alot of work for no gain. As long as the illumos foundation
is willing to earmark donations for us to use (even if they want to keep a
small amount to cover their expenses for doing so), and is fine with us
handling our governance ourselves I see no reason to go through the
At Thu, 6 Sep 2012 15:46:54 -0500,
Andrew M. Hettinger wrote:
[1 multipart/alternative (7bit)]
[1.1 text/plain; US-ASCII (quoted-printable)]
[1.2 text/html; US-ASCII (quoted-printable)]
[...]
The Illumos Foundation has been vary generous to provide us with hosting,
support,
and
In fact, the establishment of the illumos Foundation has been a fair amount
of work and is still in progress. It is incorporated in California as a
501(c)(6), has an initial board (Garrett, Jason Hoffman of Joyent, and Even
Powell of Nexenta - we expect to expand this soon), and by-laws are in
Andrew Hettinger
http://Prominic.NET || ahettin...@prominic.net
Tel: 866.339.3169 (toll free) -or- +1.217.356.2888 x.110 (int'l)
Fax: 866.372.3356 (toll free) -or- +1.217.356.3356(int'l)
Ken Gunderson kgund...@teamcool.net wrote on 09/06/2012 03:59:54 PM:
Re: [oi-dev] is
I have no problem with illumos handling earmarking. In the future, I'll want
to take a percentage of such donations for illumos general use, but I expect it
to be reasonable -- perhaps 20% or 25% - and that seems not inappropriate given
that OI uses illumos as its base anyway.
As far as
On Sep 7, 2012, at 2:59 AM, Ken Gunderson kgund...@teamcool.net wrote:
At Thu, 6 Sep 2012 15:46:54 -0500,
Andrew M. Hettinger wrote:
[1 multipart/alternative (7bit)]
[1.1 text/plain; US-ASCII (quoted-printable)]
[1.2 text/html; US-ASCII (quoted-printable)]
[...]
The Illumos
On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 12:07 AM, garrett.dam...@dey-sys.com wrote:
However I think OI and illumos have been fairly symbiotic -- indeed OI still
builds upon the illumos base, and at the moment OI is the de-facto
reference distribution of illumos. However, if OI is considering a different
17 matches
Mail list logo
