Re: [oi-dev] Problems with packages and drm

2016-12-27 Thread randyf
On Tue, 27 Dec 2016, Alexander Pyhalov wrote: Gordon, it seems the following patch fixes the issue: https://github.com/pyhalov/gfx-drm/commit/b1ebcc82b300cdb4abd4ad83b0b1b832758fb73f Current patch mechanism in gfx-drm is ugly, so I had to update also another patch, touching *.pc.in files,

Re: [oi-dev] Problems with packages and drm

2016-12-27 Thread ken mays via oi-dev
Migrate your work to libdrm 2.4.74 and we'll scan it for our compliance review. ~ Ken On Tuesday, December 27, 2016 7:17 AM, Alexander Pyhalov wrote: On 12/27/16 02:02 PM, Alexander Pyhalov wrote: > On 12/26/16 09:17 PM, Andreas Wacknitz wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I have two

Re: [oi-dev] Problems with packages and drm

2016-12-27 Thread Alexander Pyhalov
On 12/27/16 02:02 PM, Alexander Pyhalov wrote: On 12/26/16 09:17 PM, Andreas Wacknitz wrote: Hi, I have two kind of problems building and publishing packages with drm. 1. #include fails for several packags now. I don't know whether this is simply because of a missing include path or

[oi-dev] gfx-drm build issue

2016-12-27 Thread Alexander Pyhalov
Hi. Do you see this? /opt/onbld/bin/bldenv myenv.sh 'cd usr/src; make' ../../intel/io/agpgart/agpgart.c: In function 'agp_devmap_unmap': ../../intel/io/agpgart/agpgart.c:152: error: 'mementry' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wuninitialized] And compiler is correct. The

Re: [oi-dev] Problems with packages and drm

2016-12-27 Thread Alexander Pyhalov
On 12/26/16 09:17 PM, Andreas Wacknitz wrote: Hi, I have two kind of problems building and publishing packages with drm. 1. #include fails for several packags now. I don't know whether this is simply because of a missing include path or something else. Example packages: x11/mesa,

Re: [oi-dev] Problems with packages and drm

2016-12-27 Thread Alexander Jung
Hi, i experienced this problems also. Best regards, Alex On 12/26/16 07:17 PM, Andreas Wacknitz wrote: Hi, I have two kind of problems building and publishing packages with drm. 1. #include fails for several packags now. I don't know whether this is simply because of a missing include