Re: [oi-dev] sound-juicer removal?

2017-04-04 Thread Alexander Pyhalov
On 05.04.2017 00:45, Alexander Pyhalov wrote: On 04.04.2017 20:18, Alexander Pyhalov wrote: On 04/ 4/17 04:21 PM, Joerg Schilling wrote: ken mays via oi-dev wrote: Like Joerg mentioned, I also went the similar solution path with cddawav (cdrtools) when I maintained

Re: [oi-dev] sound-juicer removal?

2017-04-04 Thread Alexander Pyhalov
On 04.04.2017 20:18, Alexander Pyhalov wrote: On 04/ 4/17 04:21 PM, Joerg Schilling wrote: ken mays via oi-dev wrote: Like Joerg mentioned, I also went the similar solution path with cddawav (cdrtools) when I maintained gstreamer long ago. You can glance at

[oi-dev] Faulty PR initiated for oi-userland

2017-04-04 Thread Gary Mills
I see that I somehow created a PR for oi-userland that contains three commits. I only wanted the third one to be included, the one for: 8028 Some component Makefiles only need a PATH symbol change How can I correct this mistake? The first two are just local changes that should not appear

Re: [oi-dev] sound-juicer removal?

2017-04-04 Thread Alexander Pyhalov
On 04/ 4/17 04:21 PM, Joerg Schilling wrote: ken mays via oi-dev wrote: Like Joerg mentioned, I also went the similar solution path with cddawav (cdrtools) when I maintained gstreamer long ago. You can glance at Mediamonkey (http://www.mediamonkey.com) and Whipper

Re: [oi-dev] sound-juicer removal?

2017-04-04 Thread ken mays via oi-dev
Like Joerg mentioned, I also went the similar solution path with cddawav (cdrtools) when I maintained gstreamer long ago. You can glance at Mediamonkey (http://www.mediamonkey.com) and Whipper (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/whipper-git/) for various modernization efforts ~ Ken On

Re: [oi-dev] sound-juicer removal?

2017-04-04 Thread Joerg Schilling
Alexander Pyhalov wrote: > > Did you verify whether this brasero "update" gives you any benefit or > > whether > > it just contains modifications to use the buggy "cdrkit" instead of the > > "cdrtools" original and thus should be avoided? > > > > There have been many people asking

Re: [oi-dev] sound-juicer removal?

2017-04-04 Thread Alexander Pyhalov
On 04/ 4/17 12:16 PM, Joerg Schilling wrote: Alexander Pyhalov wrote: Hello. After updating brasero I've looked at sound-juicer to check that it didn't break... OK, old sound juicer doesn't work with new brasero. Did you verify whether this brasero "update" gives you any

Re: [oi-dev] sound-juicer removal?

2017-04-04 Thread Joerg Schilling
"Udo Grabowski (IMK)" wrote: > On 04/04/2017 10:45, Alexander Pyhalov wrote: > > ... We don't ship it, > > because cdparanoia was never properly ported to Solaris. > > It was ported to opensolaris and was available up to 151a9 from SFE: > > library/audio/libcdio (sfe)

Re: [oi-dev] sound-juicer removal?

2017-04-04 Thread Udo Grabowski (IMK)
On 04/04/2017 10:45, Alexander Pyhalov wrote: ... We don't ship it, because cdparanoia was never properly ported to Solaris. It was ported to opensolaris and was available up to 151a9 from SFE: library/audio/libcdio (sfe) 0.82-0.151.1.5 i-- library/audio/libcdio/src (sfe)

Re: [oi-dev] sound-juicer removal?

2017-04-04 Thread Joerg Schilling
Alexander Pyhalov wrote: > Hello. > > After updating brasero I've looked at sound-juicer to check that it > didn't break... OK, old sound juicer doesn't work with new brasero. Did you verify whether this brasero "update" gives you any benefit or whether it just contains

[oi-dev] sound-juicer removal?

2017-04-04 Thread Alexander Pyhalov
Hello. After updating brasero I've looked at sound-juicer to check that it didn't break... OK, old sound juicer doesn't work with new brasero. New sound juicer requires cdparanoia gstreamer 1.0 plugin. We don't ship it, because cdparanoia was never properly ported to Solaris. I've looked at