In regard to: Re: [oi-dev] Shipping the nano editor alongside with vi, Hung...:
Yes, it's just a single line. But why you give me a read-only file and
asked me to modified it?
It's much more simpler for developer with write access to do it, not me.
And it's within a second, just a single line.
I guest I figured out how to make libdazzle compiles, but I fails at the
linking stage. Not related to the Solaris patch, though. That patch doesn't
help.
Let me describe the problems in details:
libdazzle fails to compile because of a compiler flag. With this flag on, it
will fail with this
More detail:
Packages needed to install on OI: gcc-10 cmake ninja meson git pkg-config vala
Environment variable to set: export PKG_CONFIG_PATH='/usr/lib/64/pkgconfig'
We're doing a 64 bit build. I don't know why, but gobject-introspection is not
available on/usr/lib/pkgconfig, so we forced to
Yes, it's just a single line. But why you give me a read-only file and asked me
to modified it?
It's much more simpler for developer with write access to do it, not me. And
it's within a second, just a single line.
On Sun, 10 Jan 2021 00:49:50 +0700 Aurélien Larcher
wrote
>
>
I'm totally amateur. Please pardon me.
On Sun, 10 Jan 2021 02:15:15 +0700 Alan Coopersmith
wrote
> On 1/9/21 11:03 AM, Vincent Torri wrote:
> > On Sat, Jan 9, 2021 at 8:00 PM Alan Coopersmith
> > wrote:
> >> I can say that libdazzle builds on Solaris, but we apply this patch
A PR is too quick. I participated their discourse channel and asked for help:
https://discourse.gnome.org/t/building-of-epiphany-libdazzle-fails-on-openindiana/5302
On Sun, 10 Jan 2021 02:03:00 +0700 Vincent Torri
wrote
> On Sat, Jan 9, 2021 at 8:00 PM Alan Coopersmith
> wrote:
In regard to: [oi-dev] Shipping the nano editor alongside with vi, Hung...:
This should be done for none desktop OI flavors: OI text and OI minimal.
Nano is already packaged for OI, though it may not be getting installed by
default.
It's a balancing act, to decide what to include with a
On 2021-01-09 04:19, v...@bb-c.de wrote:
Hung Nguyen Gia via oi-dev writes:
Our Firefox is way too outdated. Pale Moon is the only browser working well
on OI. I came across a page on their site but can't find it again, it
basically stated that the packaging of Pale Moon on OI was resisted by
On 1/9/21 11:03 AM, Vincent Torri wrote:
On Sat, Jan 9, 2021 at 8:00 PM Alan Coopersmith
wrote:
I can say that libdazzle builds on Solaris, but we apply this patch to
make it build:
https://github.com/oracle/solaris-userland/blob/master/components/gnome/libdazzle/patches/link.patch
why not
On Sat, Jan 9, 2021 at 8:00 PM Alan Coopersmith
wrote:
>
> On 1/9/21 12:15 AM, Hung Nguyen Gia via oi-dev wrote:
> > In no way I'm a professional developer. I just pulled the source of it from
> > github and tried to compile it by following the instructions.
> >
> >
On Sat, 9 Jan 2021 at 04:19, Volker A. Brandt wrote:
> Hung Nguyen Gia via oi-dev writes:
> > I know their branding issue. But we could easily overcome it by not build
> > with their official branding, our browser will be named New Moon and
> > everything is fine. Please let me know more about
On Sat, Jan 9, 2021 at 5:18 PM Hung Nguyen Gia
wrote:
> I hope you are happily to read me, too. You should remember me when we
> encountered on illumos.org/issues page.
>
> If you want to know, my vote is: Building with GCC-10 and Updating Clang.
>
> Compiler tool chain is one of the weakness of
On Sat, Jan 9, 2021 at 9:09 AM Hung Nguyen Gia via oi-dev <
oi-dev@openindiana.org> wrote:
> This should be done for none desktop OI flavors: OI text and OI minimal.
>
> It will help novice user like me very much. Please consider it,
> developers. I have trouble using the vi editor even though I
If I can I already done. I know I'm just a little man I can't deal with monster
like Firefox.
My requirements are low. A browser could load non videos site fine is enough
for me.
So I decided to continue with Epiphany.
BTW, it's the GNOME project's official browser. Being backed by GNOME,
Hi. Do you see this mail on the archive?
I didn't see it. Resend it for you to not miss my vote.
On Sat, 09 Jan 2021 23:18:41 +0700 Hung Nguyen Gia via oi-dev
wrote
> I hope you are happily to read me, too. You should remember me when we
> encountered on illumos.org/issues page.
Everyone starts like that.
The docs are designed to be read and used even by non developers. The
point of this is to have more developers. The only way to have more
developers and contributors, is to offer resources for training. By
being able to compile software you are already quite far
I hope you are happily to read me, too. You should remember me when we
encountered on illumos.org/issues page.
If you want to know, my vote is: Building with GCC-10 and Updating Clang.
Compiler tool chain is one of the weakness of OI. If you could get the latest
stable compiler working and
Maybe you are misunderstood. I'm not that powerful to be able to be a
developer. All of what I did as I described is I trying to build this browser
on OI. Porting is the wrong word. My bad. It's such a too big word to be used.
I'm currently stuck at libdazzle, a dependency of Epiphany. It
Hung Nguyen Gia writes:
> Well. Have read the whole discussion. Too bad, Pale Moon is the only way to
> watch 4K quality videos on youtube on OI. Our outdated Firefox can't deal
> with this.
Then your efforts would be well-spent on helpinh to build a newer Fire-
fox release, which several people
Well. Have read the whole discussion. Too bad, Pale Moon is the only way to
watch 4K quality videos on youtube on OI. Our outdated Firefox can't deal with
this.
If you rejected Pale Moon then please help me with the porting of the Epiphany
Browser. You could see my mail about this on this
Hi
Thanks for the initiative. Will you stay around longer and package some
softwares?
Have you had a look into http://docs.openindiana.org/dev/userland/ It
gives you instructions on how to properly build and package components
for OI. If you get stuck on something we can have a look at your
> Glad you are doing better.
>
Hi Alan,
thank you or kind message, happy to read you :)
I have been a "long hauler", took 9 months to get back to (almost) normal.
> For whatever it's worth, we've pushed our changes for some of these to our
> github repos (though you obviously have many
Hi,
just a few notes:
1) Following Apostolos message python-37 was modified to provide IDLE in a
separate package: idle-37. After the next update you may need to reinstall
it.
2) The library libpython3.so which provides a stable ABI was not provided
by python-3X packages, this is now the case for
Hung Nguyen Gia via oi-dev writes:
> Our Firefox is way too outdated. Pale Moon is the only browser working well
> on OI. I came across a page on their site but can't find it again, it
> basically stated that the packaging of Pale Moon on OI was resisted by OI
> developers. So what's wrong with
Our Firefox is way too outdated. Pale Moon is the only browser working well on
OI. I came across a page on their site but can't find it again, it basically
stated that the packaging of Pale Moon on OI was resisted by OI developers. So
what's wrong with Pale Moon?
I know their branding issue.
In no way I'm a professional developer. I just pulled the source of it from
github and tried to compile it by following the instructions.
https://github.com/GNOME/epiphany
Currently, I'm stuck at libdazzle. I will not compile under OI.
https://github.com/GNOME/libdazzle
Any helps would be
This should be done for none desktop OI flavors: OI text and OI minimal.
It will help novice user like me very much. Please consider it, developers. I
have trouble using the vi editor even though I have my mobile phone with me as
a backup showing the vi tutorial. And I think many other novice
27 matches
Mail list logo
