Just fyi: I still didn't give up and on each day I spend at least 12 hours (on
some days 18 hours) on it.
The idiot who at first pretended wanting to give me a job in Brussels then -
after I settled things to move to Brussels - suddenly had no interest anymore
(#20 of such type). At first he
Err, this output was generated on Intel 2nd gen i7 2700k 1155 3.5GHZ @8x3,9GHz.
== Sandy
prtdiag -v
System Configuration: Gigabyte Technology Co., Ltd. H61M-S2V-B3
BIOS Configuration: Award Software International, Inc. F8 03/27/2012
Processor Sockets
Ok, maybe there is still hope.
I finally identified the exact piece of code which is _really_ causing all this
(the backtraces were misleading, because of reasons I won't explain at this
time, because the Tea-water is boiling), in file ./i915/src/i915_gem.c" line
3669 of 3994 --91%--
int
Hi all (here).
No, we won't need more of this non-coming "help".
I made some progress with finding out how the essential offsets are handled,
with data structures of so called cookies (no, Nuland and other
mass-slaughterers and war-criminals are not invited).
Here only a quick grep:
Err, the lowest nm line was not specifically related to Xen, hence it was
meant to be:
nm /platform/i86pc/kernel/misc/amd64/gfx_private|grep ookie
09c0 T gfxp_umem_cookie_destroy
0970 T gfxp_umem_cookie_init
___
oi-dev
On Monday, December 14, 2015 7:11 PM, Мартин Бохниг
wrote:
Hi Ken,
did you ever have a look at the hw support matrix of the last ums (aka non-kms)
Intel 2.6.3->2.9.1 ddx???
It is suited for museum presentations, showing that DRM/DRI was already
available in the
Hi Ken,
we are waiting for more than two weeks for answers to simple questions, like
for example how Sun implements gfxp_alloc_kernel_space() and
gfxp_load_kernel_space() _precisely_ and what's wrong with my alternatives
published 5 days ago (they do work on Sol11.1++, but not on 11.0 nor
ken mays via oi-dev писал 15.12.2015 20:11:
On Monday, December 14, 2015 7:11 PM, Мартин Бохниг
wrote:
Maybe, to move forward and not backward, we could do just that. Push
out Xserver 1.17.4 and review alternative or unified methods to
support Intel/Radeon drivers from that
Hi Ken,
>Вторник, 15 декабря 2015, 2:38 UTC от ken mays via oi-dev
>:
>
>Martin,
>
>I'm all for forward movement, but we could review the use of XServer 1.7.7 w/
>Intel 2.6.3->2.9.1 and Radeon 6.14.6.
>We know it works for the Intel driver code already, so we'd need to
Martin,
I'm all for forward movement, but we could review the use of XServer 1.7.7 w/
Intel 2.6.3->2.9.1 and Radeon 6.14.6.We know it works for the Intel driver code
already, so we'd need to add the missing Radeon pieces.
Can use oi_151a9/OpenSXCE or others.
Might help keep legacy alive...?
Ken
Hi Ken,
did you ever have a look at the hw support matrix of the last ums (aka non-kms)
Intel 2.6.3->2.9.1 ddx???
It is suited for museum presentations, showing that DRM/DRI was already
available in the steam/coal age.
For radeon: Sure, but that wasn't even scratched so far.
(and it is
I forgot to mention, that I'm the only one in the world outside of MS or
Caldera ('s court trial), who ever found out how it is possible to start the
DOS32 extender shipped with Win9x/ME as VMM32.vxd on MS-DOS 6.22 and down to
MS-DOS and (from the same src tree) IBM-DOS 5.00 and even non
randyf at sibernet.com randyf at sibernet.com
Tue Dec 1 06:44:23 UTC 2015
>
> For a long time I had wished that somebody at Sun/Oracle might give as a view
> at their modern gfxp implementation, which has proven to be a highly moving
> target (unfortunately only since after the closing of
>Понедельник, 14 декабря 2015, 23:44 +03:00 от Мартин Бохниг :
>
>
>randyf at sibernet.com randyf at sibernet.com
>Tue Dec 1 06:44:23 UTC 2015
>>
>> For a long time I had wished that somebody at Sun/Oracle might give as a
>> view
>> at their modern gfxp implementation, which
Ok, while I didn't want to flood this list with all symbols of all versions
and exact details regarding what arrived (or in some cases disappeared) when, I
should probably provide at least one complete listing for the latest verion of
gfx_private, taken on Solaris 11.3.
Quite some calls also
Ok, maybe this is no longer the case.
Here the situation on a default Solaris11.3:
martin@solaris11:~$ grep -n i915 /etc/*
/etc/driver_aliases:563:i915 "pci8086,42"
/etc/driver_aliases:564:i915 "pci8086,46"
/etc/driver_aliases:565:i915 "pci8086,102"
/etc/driver_aliases:566:i915 "pci8086,106"
root@solaris:~# grep -n i915 /etc/*
/etc/driver_aliases:8:i915 "pci8086,102"
/etc/driver_aliases:9:i915 "pci8086,106"
/etc/driver_aliases:10:i915 "pci8086,10a"
/etc/driver_aliases:11:i915 "pci8086,112"
/etc/driver_aliases:12:i915 "pci8086,116"
/etc/driver_aliases:13:i915 "pci8086,122"
>Пятница, 11 декабря 2015, 19:50 -08:00 от ran...@sibernet.com:
>
>
>> First let's give Sun/Oracle Menlo Park some time to respond.
>
> Two comments immediately come to mind:
>
>Don't be changing copyrights
>Be mindful of attribution of imported source.
>
>
>
>rf
Where did I change
>agpgart doesn't care about the drm/i915 pci id's either.
>
> The one that is relevant is the id's in the package manifest:
>
>https://hg.openindiana.org/upstream/oracle/x-cons/x-s12-clone/file/5dc3c751c9c5/pkg/manifests/driver-graphics-drm.p5m
>
That one is only the external bindings for
> D) Repeated that while earlier having also replaced all agp
> modules/submodules.
> Still works.
If anybody got confused already: Back to the 11.0 versions, I mean.
Although the rest of the kernel is 11.1, but with 11.0 agpgart and with the
open-src Sol12 SunDRM/KMS gate plus my diffs as
Dear Randy
Thank you for the pointer !
> The one that is relevant is the id's in the package manifest:
>
>
> https://hg.openindiana.org/upstream/oracle/x-cons/x-s12-clone/file/5dc3c751c9c5/pkg/manifests/driver-graphics-drm.p5m
>
> And I'm guessing that the pciid for the X230 is in this list,
>Суббота, 12 декабря 2015, 20:26 +01:00 от Aurélien Larcher
>:
>
>Dear Randy
>Thank you for the pointer !
>
>>
>> The one that is relevant is the id's in the package manifest:
>>
On Fri, 11 Dec 2015, Мартин Бохниг wrote:
Hi Aurélien,
Пятница, 11 декабря 2015, 19:47 +01:00 от Aurélien Larcher
:
To be precise, at least I can see that the device id is not
listed in:
Hello,
OK thanks for the clarification, I was just a matter of knowing on which
hardware this could be tested later on.
Best regards
Aurélien
On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 8:12 PM, Мартин Бохниг wrote:
> Hi Aurélien,
>
> ah, sorry, your link pointed to Sun's/Oracle's new port,
Hi Alan,
thank you for the confirmation that some adapter under the "Intel HD
Graphics" commercial name (5th gen onwards) are supported.
My concern was whether the driver is limited to former "Intel Graphics"
commercial name (3rd and 4th), which indeed includes i915 to i965 chipsets
or, according
Hi Aurélien,
ah, sorry, your link pointed to Sun's/Oracle's new port, rather than to Illumos.
But nevertheless: pciids are a thing that can be updated at one calm evening
(on complicated code like DRM, in 5 minutes elsewhere).
However - it is completely pointless to discuss about hw matrix and
On 12/11/15 10:39 AM, Aurélien Larcher wrote:
Hi Martin,
thanks for the update!
The manual page mentions that support concerns:
"[...] the Intel i845, i865, i915, i945, i965 and G33 series integrated graphics
controllers."
while ThinkWiki mentions that, for Linux, the i915 driver may be used
Hi Martin,
thanks for the update!
The manual page mentions that support concerns:
"[...] the Intel i845, i865, i915, i945, i965 and G33 series
integrated graphics controllers."
while ThinkWiki mentions that, for Linux, the i915 driver may be used with
Intel HD Graphics.
Do you know if it is also
To be precise, at least I can see that the device id is not listed in:
https://hg.openindiana.org/upstream/oracle/x-cons/x-s12-clone/file/5dc3c751c9c5/open-src/kernel/sys/drm/drm_pciids.h
On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 7:39 PM, Aurélien Larcher <
aurelien.larc...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Martin,
>
Hi Aurélien,
>Пятница, 11 декабря 2015, 19:47 +01:00 от Aurélien Larcher
>:
>
>To be precise, at least I can see that the device id is not listed in:
>
Update: Yes, only switching back to from gcc to Studio made the bins work
again on S11.1++ (without a single src change)
Diffs, bins and crash dumps (generated on 11.0) as well as /var/adm/messages*
(also from the same 11.0 host) have been uploaded as promised to:
Hello,
now finally, but without time to instruct newcomers.
I only post this _early_ to prove I'm not talking about hot air / vapoware.
At the moment - when building with gcc - I get an assertiob error and resulting
panic _also_ on Sol11.1++ (unlike 2 weeks ago when mostly building with the
Friends,
NOW FINALY in the next hours I can do it.
It is unbelievable how time- and resources-consuming such self-defence against
two distinct criminal companies can be where I had previously been a customer,
if you get several letters per day in a row, which threaten you all the time
Thank you Nikola!
Sorry for the further delay.
Just as I had assumed before - meanwhile we have it black on white - the person
who was foolish enough to sue __me__ has a known "certain history" (to put it
mildly) :
Bad Eggs - the smell sticks
On 12/ 5/15 08:42 AM, Мартин Бохниг wrote:
I finally have about exactly 26 hours of time for community work plus
already did rest 5 hours.
You certanly are most dedicated on community work and you have highly
technical abilities
and I thank you so much.
Dear Friends,
thanks for your patience and sorry that I could not read any email for almost a
week.
Finally I sent all legal texts regarding the first suit. And as it looks I
might probably win the case and currently I'm demanding back 1000 EUR, rather
than paying those ridiculous
Hey Randy!
I could hardly believe what I just saw :)
I thank you from the bottom of my heart (also in the name of the overall
hardcore OpenSolaris community) for taking the time to deal with us here :)
These thanks also go to Alan because presumably he helped in making you aware
of my
Sorry, I'm only on oi-dev, so feel free to forward elsewhere.
For a long time I had wished that somebody at Sun/Oracle might give as a view
at their modern gfxp implementation, which has proven to be a highly moving
target (unfortunately only since after the closing of OS/Net).
It's
38 matches
Mail list logo