Hi,
Didn't get any time over the weekend until now.
I've just cleaned up my epub branch, but PR #184 was automatically closed, so I
generated a new PR #186, which is just PR #184 with my very old merge conflicts
hopefully correctly resolved.
The makepdf should select your newer pdf generation
Hi,
On Mon, 2021-06-07 at 19:37 +0100, James Madgwick wrote:
> On Mon, 07 Jun 2021 19:19:35 +0200
> benn wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> > Didn't get any time over the weekend until now.
> >
> > I've just cleaned up my epub branch, but PR #184 was automatically
> > closed, so I generated a new PR #186, which
On Mon, 07 Jun 2021 19:19:35 +0200
benn wrote:
> Hi,
> Didn't get any time over the weekend until now.
>
> I've just cleaned up my epub branch, but PR #184 was automatically
> closed, so I generated a new PR #186, which is just PR #184 with my
> very old merge conflicts hopefully correctly
On Mon, 07 Jun 2021 22:26:07 +0200
benn wrote:
> > I can see what the changes are and I already tested them last week,
> > so I can make a PR myself which includes them if you're happy with
> > that. I'm not sure why the old PR was closed.
> Go ahead. No more work this evening for me.
I've
Apologies for replying to own own email, but I've found some more
information on the OpenSolaris doc-style.
On Fri, 4 Jun 2021 21:21:19 +0100
James Madgwick wrote:
> In general, I'm not sure about using Pandoc with LaTex to try and
> create PDFs in the OpenSolaris style. It might make more
On Fri, 04 Jun 2021 11:49:20 +0200
benn wrote:
> > Only after some struggling with errors in the Lua filter did I
> > realize the features needed to make the PDF presentable required
> > the latest version of pandoc, or at least a version newer than the
> > one found in Debian stable. I
Hi,
On Thu, 2021-06-03 at 22:31 +0100, James Madgwick wrote:
> On Wed, 02 Jun 2021 23:19:27 +0200
> benn wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> > I've added a Pull Request, 'Add support for epub and different pandoc
> > versions #184', which resolves a number of problems with the current
> > makepdf.sh script.
> >
On Wed, 02 Jun 2021 23:19:27 +0200
benn wrote:
> Hi,
> I've added a Pull Request, 'Add support for epub and different pandoc
> versions #184', which resolves a number of problems with the current
> makepdf.sh script.
>
> I thought support for epub generation had been added, but this was
> only
In regard to: Re: [oi-dev] PR #184: Support for epub and pandoc version...:
Do you use Haskell for other projects? Even having someone that can
reliably test an experimental package and offer feedback increases the
likelihood of getting the package into a usable state.
I'm afraid that I do
Hi,
On Wed, 2021-06-02 at 16:48 -0500, Tim Mooney via oi-dev wrote:
> In regard to: [oi-dev] PR #184: Support for epub and pandoc version...:
>
> > We do not have a pandoc package for OI
> > which would ease the problem. However, pandoc is big and it might not be
> > trivial
> > to
> > create
In regard to: [oi-dev] PR #184: Support for epub and pandoc version...:
We do not have a pandoc package for OI
which would ease the problem. However, pandoc is big and it might not be
trivial to
create such a package for OI.
Size isn't going to be the most difficult issue here.
It appears
11 matches
Mail list logo
