On 05/ 6/16 08:06 PM, WebDawg wrote:
I am starting from the first email because there have been so many
replies and responses to this one and no one has provided anything but
it seems negative feedback to this git site. I also see very little
contribution to the subject of documentation.
Right
On Fri, May 6, 2016 at 8:06 PM, WebDawg wrote:
> > Date: Sun, 1 May 2016 00:30:55 -0400
> > From: Michael Kruger
> > To: OpenIndiana Developer mailing list ,
> > Discussion list for OpenIndiana <
>
> 1) Place documentation under distributed version control.
>
> Not all documentation I think should be under version control.
> Though, documentation created by the people that help create OI I
> think would. I really think that what you are creating is not a
> documentation site but a new
> Date: Sun, 1 May 2016 00:30:55 -0400
> From: Michael Kruger
> To: OpenIndiana Developer mailing list ,
> Discussion list for OpenIndiana
> Subject: [oi-dev] demonstration docs website
> Message-ID:
On 05/04/2016 06:52 AM, Alexander Pyhalov wrote:
> Hi, Michael.
>
> Thank you for your work.
> To move further I think we should consider several questions...
>
> 1) Someone should look through the docs... So , reviewers are welcome.
> Have you changed "OpenSolaris Redistributable Books" in any
On 05/01/2016 07:30, Michael Kruger wrote:
Hello all,
Here is a little something I have been working to help showcase
documentation for the OpenIndiana project.
Currently hosted are:
OpenIndiana FAQ (Complete, but still growing and improving)
OpenIndiana Handbook (little more than a template
On 05/ 2/16 06:29 PM, WebDawg wrote:
You guys are all so very confusing. It seems to me someone put
together an example docs site and everyone keeps talking about how it
is hosted on github, licensing, and stuff.
Please hit "reply" when posting to the list so your answers stay in-line
on
You guys are all so very confusing. It seems to me someone put together an
example docs site and everyone keeps talking about how it is hosted on
github, licensing, and stuff.
Did I miss something or did the individual that submitted it say it has to
stay there?
I get the XML thing...it seems
On 05/ 2/16 03:44 PM, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
On Mon, 2 May 2016, Nikola M wrote:
On 05/ 2/16 08:56 AM, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
On 05/ 1/16 10:48 PM, Nikola M wrote:
*You aether accept open documentation license including Contributor
agreement to
OI or you contribute your time at somewhere
On Mon, 2 May 2016, Nikola M wrote:
On 05/ 2/16 08:56 AM, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
On 05/ 1/16 10:48 PM, Nikola M wrote:
*You aether accept open documentation license including Contributor
agreement to
OI or you contribute your time at somewhere else.*
Why don't you let the people who run
On 05/ 2/16 10:30 AM, Илья Архипкин wrote:
Very well written, and you officially their conviction simply am not
who wrote a lot of paperwork, but in this segment of the Russian order
to find a lot of people are erotic, free content. And to compete with
my domain get a DDoS-attacks, spam
Very well written, and you officially their conviction simply am not who
wrote a lot of paperwork, but in this segment of the Russian order to
find a lot of people are erotic, free content. And to compete with my
domain get a DDoS-attacks, spam attacks. Moreover, against the
background of
On 05/ 2/16 08:56 AM, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
On 05/ 1/16 10:48 PM, Nikola M wrote:
*You aether accept open documentation license including Contributor
agreement to
OI or you contribute your time at somewhere else.*
Why don't you let the people who run the project decide whether or not
to
On 05/ 1/16 03:13 PM, Michael Kruger wrote:
point, the site and it's contents automatically builds and deploys
upon git commit.
Building prior making something should be done on OI's servers to ensure
it includes only what is in the source.
All Openindiana infrastructure things can be easily
On 05/ 1/16 10:48 PM, Nikola M wrote:
*You aether accept open documentation license including Contributor agreement to
OI or you contribute your time at somewhere else.*
Why don't you let the people who run the project decide whether or not to accept
contributions before you chase everyone
On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 7:48 AM, Nikola M wrote:
> On 05/ 1/16 04:45 PM, Aurélien Larcher wrote:
>
>
> I would like you have been doing this not alone, but within Openindiana
>> community and cooperation with others, with announcing it here.
>>
>
> Oh but this has been the
Hello !
That looks very promising !
> I would like you have been doing this not alone, but within Openindiana
> community and cooperation with others, with announcing it here.
>
Oh but this has been the opportunity of several discussion on irc and by
email.
I think the idea of a proof of
On 05/01/2016 04:56 AM, Nikola M wrote:
I would like you have been doing this not alone, but within Openindiana
community and cooperation with others, with announcing it here.
Also using Openindiana brand name outside openindiana.org for site names
(like .ninja etc) is not good, since it is
On 05/ 1/16 06:30 AM, Michael Kruger wrote:
Hello all,
Here is a little something I have been working to help showcase
documentation for the OpenIndiana project.
Currently hosted are:
OpenIndiana FAQ (Complete, but still growing and improving)
OpenIndiana Handbook (little more than a
19 matches
Mail list logo