Re: [oi-dev] OI 'hipster' reboot effort

2013-05-18 Thread Udo Grabowski (IMK)
On 18/05/2013 15:28, ken mays wrote: Hello Andrzej, Bumping oi-userland to userland s12-12.1 and the recent general updates for oi_151a8 (hipster) were excellent accomplishments. Yet I'd like to toss over this info from my notes from the OpenSXCE project for further hipster minor updates and ad

Re: [oi-dev] OI project reboot required

2013-05-18 Thread Bob Friesenhahn
On Sun, 12 May 2013, Garrett D'Amore wrote: We're going to have to support a 32-bit userland for some time to come, unfortunately, but we should no longer make that the default, and we should deliver all of our system utilities in 64-bit only form, IMO; and we could entirely kill off the 32-b

Re: [oi-dev] OI 'hipster' reboot effort

2013-05-18 Thread ken mays
Hello Andrzej, Bumping oi-userland to userland s12-12.1 and the recent general updates for oi_151a8 (hipster) were excellent accomplishments. Yet I'd like to toss over this info from my notes from the OpenSXCE project for further hipster minor updates and additions: * Bump illumos to c

Re: [oi-dev] OI 'hipster' reboot effort

2013-05-18 Thread Garrett D'Amore
On May 18, 2013, at 8:49 AM, David Höppner <0xf...@gmail.com> wrote: > no. > > Discussion was about discontinuing the 32-bit kernel and to enable > 64-bit usr/src/cmd. > Userland will be 32- and 64-bit. Upstream oracle builds 32- and 64-bit > libraries, while > standalone programs are converted

Re: [oi-dev] OI 'hipster' reboot effort

2013-05-18 Thread David Höppner
no. Discussion was about discontinuing the 32-bit kernel and to enable 64-bit usr/src/cmd. Userland will be 32- and 64-bit. Upstream oracle builds 32- and 64-bit libraries, while standalone programs are converted to 64-bit only. -- David On 18 May 2013 07:13, Branden Harper wrote: > Along those