Re: [oi-dev] "Fixed Enlightenment" or "Beware of epoll"

2017-04-12 Thread Bob Friesenhahn
On Tue, 11 Apr 2017, Joshua M. Clulow wrote: If there's real software that requires things we're not implementing, we may well need to fix the emulation layer. After all, it forms the foundation of epoll support in the LX brand as well. I learned the hard way that emulated epoll fails if the

Re: [oi-dev] "Fixed Enlightenment" or "Beware of epoll"

2017-04-12 Thread Adam Števko
Hey, lx separatiom is being worked on by me, but I had more important things to attend, so I lost focus. I will see what I can do during the weekend. The implementatuon was already reviwed and Joyent people were OK with. I just meed to publish the final webrev on illumos-developer. Cheers,

Re: [oi-dev] "Fixed Enlightenment" or "Beware of epoll"

2017-04-12 Thread Vincent Torri
On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 9:06 AM, Joshua M. Clulow wrote: > On 11 April 2017 at 23:57, Vincent Torri wrote: >> I can provide a fix in the build system of the EFL for the next >> release, but indeed, it would be better to hide the linux emulation >> layer.

Re: [oi-dev] "Fixed Enlightenment" or "Beware of epoll"

2017-04-12 Thread Joshua M. Clulow
On 11 April 2017 at 23:57, Vincent Torri wrote: > I can provide a fix in the build system of the EFL for the next > release, but indeed, it would be better to hide the linux emulation > layer. I can do that today I'd still like to understand the precise nature of the

Re: [oi-dev] "Fixed Enlightenment" or "Beware of epoll"

2017-04-12 Thread Alexander Pyhalov
On 12.04.2017 08:32, Aurélien Larcher wrote: Hi, yesterday I figured out why EFL stopped working suddenly several (too many) months ago: was added and one source started using silently epoll in the main loop. But epoll in illumos does not implement the same behaviour as in Linux: