Hi.
On 12.05.2017 02:14, Gordon Ross wrote:
I've been trying out the latest OI build, and most things look great!
(Thanks to everyone who helped.)
However, I have some 3rd party stuff that wants older versions of perl
(5.10.0, 5.16) and python (2.6) and I can't figure out how to get pkg
to let
On 11.05.2017 22:13, Peter Tribble wrote:
On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 6:56 PM, Aurélien Larcher <
aurelien.larc...@gmail.com> wrote:
The question raised is whether we should formalize a maintaining
process
for some important components or groups of components.
At some point I joked about a
À Jeudi 11 mai 2017, Adam Števko a écrit :
> Hello,
>
> I would like to keep the status quo in this. We don’t have formal maintainers
> and basically every change to the package/component is reviewed by relevant
> person (me/alp/aurelien//jimklimov/wacki/agnar). I would really like to see
>
I've been trying out the latest OI build, and most things look great!
(Thanks to everyone who helped.)
However, I have some 3rd party stuff that wants older versions of perl
(5.10.0, 5.16) and python (2.6) and I can't figure out how to get pkg
to let me install those along side the current ones
Hello,
I would like to keep the status quo in this. We don’t have formal maintainers
and basically every change to the package/component is reviewed by relevant
person (me/alp/aurelien//jimklimov/wacki/agnar). I would really like to see
this list to grow and reach the phase that we need to
Sorry, I haven't been able to help here. I am quite busy with private
things at the moment.
Regards,
Andreas
Am 11.05.17 um 13:42 schrieb Carsten Grzemba:
On 10.05.17 07:21, *Carsten Grzemba * wrote:
On 09.05.17 23:16, *Adam Števko * wrote:
On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 6:56 PM, Aurélien Larcher <
aurelien.larc...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> The question raised is whether we should formalize a maintaining process
> for some important components or groups of components.
>
> At some point I joked about a campaign going like "Adopt a package".
>
Hi,
following an offlist discussion with Darek, he asked:
Is there any list of components, which have maintainers?
> This case shows that some components need maintainers. I guess some people
> decide whether a component needs a maintainer or not.
>
I explained that there are no officially
Hello.
Yes IPS uses precompiled Packages. However it does not distribute them
as tarball archives but as seperate files. These fiels are Linked
together by the manifests of a Package. Which is a Textfile describing
all files, symlinks, mediators, etc. of a package.
IPS itself does not use
On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 5:05 PM, Cezary Podbilski via oi-dev <
oi-dev@openindiana.org> wrote:
> Aurélien,
>
>
> Awesome, sounds good! Please brief away
>
Very good! Let us handle the details off-list.
Kind regards
Aurelien
>
>
> Regards
>
>
> Cezary
>
>
> À Mercredi 10 mai 2017, Cezary
On 10.05.17 07:21, Carsten Grzemba wrote:
>
>
>
> On 09.05.17 23:16, Adam Števko wrote:
> >
> > Hey,
> >
> > yes and possibly submit a fix, please.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Adam
> >
> > > On May 9, 2017, at 7:56 PM, Andreas Wacknitz
On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 12:18 PM, Dariusz Sendkowski
wrote:
> I guess that is exactly how it is done in OpenBSD. You have precompiled
> binaries, which you can fetch and install. You can also build them by
> yourself using OpenBSD ports system. If the original site is
I guess that is exactly how it is done in OpenBSD. You have precompiled
binaries, which you can fetch and install. You can also build them by
yourself using OpenBSD ports system. If the original site is unavailable,
the sources are downloaded directly from OpenBSD servers, for example:
# cd
Hi,
What happens when a component archive url points to a web resource that is
unavailable temporarily or, even worse, permanently? How does it impact the
package availability?
Are all these oi-userland components precompiled and stored somewhere on
the publisher server along with the sources?
14 matches
Mail list logo