Re: [oi-dev] Binary-only packages

2020-03-29 Thread Gary Mills
On Sun, Mar 29, 2020 at 02:12:24PM +, Alexander Pyhalov via oi-dev wrote: > While preparing hipster.openindiana.org to gcc-7 full rebuild I've > found the following packages, which were not provided by Aurelien's > repo (these are mostly binary-only packages or packages which should > be marke

Re: [oi-dev] Binary-only packages

2020-03-29 Thread Alan Coopersmith
On 3/29/20 7:12 AM, Alexander Pyhalov via oi-dev wrote: > cde/calendar-manager-server 0.5.11-2013.0.0.0 > i-- > cde/cde-runtime 0.5.11-2013.0.0.0 > i-- > cde/cde-utilities 0.5.11-2013.0.0.0

Re: [oi-dev] Binary-only packages

2020-03-29 Thread Alexander Pyhalov via oi-dev
They are installed on build server currently. Some of them are binary-only, like cpp, for which we still haven't imported replacement. Most of them are just old crap, which should be marked obsolet. But some of them are probably useful and open sourced (like different input methods, fonts and uti

Re: [oi-dev] Binary-only packages

2020-03-29 Thread Till Wegmüller
Hi Alexander On 29.03.20 16:12, Alexander Pyhalov via oi-dev wrote: > documentation/gnome/gnome-user-docs 2.32.0-2018.0.0.0 > i-- Apart from this one all packages are from 2013. Are they even installable? My guess is the incorporations would block them from being installe

[oi-dev] Binary-only packages

2020-03-29 Thread Alexander Pyhalov via oi-dev
Hi. While preparing hipster.openindiana.org to gcc-7 full rebuild I've found the following packages, which were not provided by Aurelien's repo (these are mostly binary-only packages or packages which should be marked obsolete). Some of them likely could be imported to oi-userland (like fakeroo