Jörg
, I believe there should be no problem in OS integration of OpenZFS in
illumos. In fact the concern now is quite the opposite: how to decouple
ZFS from the rest of illumos core technologies and enable clean re-use and
open collaboration.
For now the illumOS implementation of ZFS is ok
On 02/20/2014 02:26 PM, Jonathan Adams wrote:
I don't know how to do it myself, but I'm sure that a list of my
minimum criteria would be good for the whole ecosystem.
will you please implement these changes and get back to me asap.
Thanks
PS. can we have a new logo and pie charts? ;-P
seth Nimbosa darth.seri...@gmail.com wrote:
The reason we need a minimum of criteria for collaboration is precisely
because the different distributions have different focus, approach, and use
case scenarios in mind, but a set of core features that will make it to a
unified kernel will be for
Quick Question: can anyone tell me about illumos integration of system
tools/utilities from ATT AST and/or the Heirloom Project? Or are there
any licensing concerns about that? Thanks!
This week I have been going around the University of the Philippines to see
if they can lend idle boxes and
Hi Seth,
The developers working on AST or Heirloom are the contact points. Best to ask
them through their IRC/forums.
~ Ken Mays
Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android
___
oi-dev mailing list
oi-dev@openindiana.org
On 02/19/2014 10:34 PM, seth Nimbosa wrote:
The reason we need a minimum of criteria for collaboration is
precisely because the different distributions have different focus,
approach, and use case scenarios in mind, but a set of core features
that will make it to a unified kernel will be for
I don't know how to do it myself, but I'm sure that a list of my minimum
criteria would be good for the whole ecosystem.
will you please implement these changes and get back to me asap.
Thanks
PS. can we have a new logo and pie charts? ;-P
http://www.27bslash6.com/p2p2.html
On 20 February
The reason we need a minimum of criteria for collaboration is precisely
because the different distributions have different focus, approach, and use
case scenarios in mind, but a set of core features that will make it to a
unified kernel will be for everyone's benefit. Additional layers will be
On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 9:38 PM, David H davidha...@gmail.com wrote:
Collaboration Criteria:
- The original promise was for both Intel SPARC in the community,
that promise should be kept.
Do the work. Illumos itself has gone to a great deal of trouble
to maintain parity between x86 and
On 2014-02-18 21:48, Peter Tribble wrote:
This requires support
for the Bourne Shell for all scripts that need to be run
before /usr
is mounted, which means to fix 6 shell scripts modified
by Sun in
spring 2010.
And the illumos bug ids are?
On 02/18/2014 10:45 PM, Jim Klimov wrote:
I have yet to notice any functional-equivalency downsides
of old sh vs. ksh (or bash for that matter), although the
memory footprint comparison was often cited as a difference.
As one of the original advocates for including ksh93 in Solaris,
I
11 matches
Mail list logo
