Re: [oi-dev] Stats

2014-12-17 Thread ken mays via oi-dev
The current analogy is: 1. Solaris 10/11 - production2. OpenIndiana - development/testing (but CAN be used in 24/7 production) Hipster snapshots, the latest versions, work reliably on specific hardware and when using specific applications. As for the small developer support, much of what was

Re: [oi-dev] Stats

2014-12-17 Thread Alan Coopersmith
On 12/17/14 08:32 AM, ken mays via oi-dev wrote: The current analogy is: 1. Solaris 10/11 - production 2. OpenIndiana - development/testing (but CAN be used in 24/7 production) That's a weird analogy since they're different forks - it'd be like saying RHEL is production, Debian sid is testing

Re: [oi-dev] Stats

2014-12-17 Thread Thomas Wagner
On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 08:41:47PM -0600, Bob Friesenhahn wrote: On Sat, 13 Dec 2014, Alexander Pyhalov wrote: OI Hipster change log can be found here: http://wiki.openindiana.org/oi/oi_hipster I think that this looks impressive. The main issue (feature-wise) seems to be the loss of

Re: [oi-dev] Stats

2014-12-12 Thread Bob Friesenhahn
On Sat, 13 Dec 2014, Alexander Pyhalov wrote: OI Hipster change log can be found here: http://wiki.openindiana.org/oi/oi_hipster I think that this looks impressive. The main issue (feature-wise) seems to be the loss of SFE binary packages, and that SFE packages are not yet ready for GCC