... and I was fooled by that hash showing only digits < 'a' :)
On Tue, Jun 1, 2021 at 10:10 AM Gordon Ross wrote:
>
> Oh, nevermind. The git clone I was looking in simply didn't have that
> commit hash.
>
> On Tue, Jun 1, 2021 at 10:09 AM Gordon Ross wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I regularly
Oh, nevermind. The git clone I was looking in simply didn't have that
commit hash.
On Tue, Jun 1, 2021 at 10:09 AM Gordon Ross wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I regularly use "uname -a" to look at the git hash for the illumos
> base (in order to know what libraries and such would be compatible).
> After
Hi all,
I regularly use "uname -a" to look at the git hash for the illumos
base (in order to know what libraries and such would be compatible).
After an update today I see the version shown there is apparently
something else? I also tried "mcs -p".
gwr@gwr-oi2$ uname -a
SunOS gwr-oi2 5.11
