Re: [oi-dev] [OpenIndiana-discuss] Studio future in OI (Re: )

2013-10-13 Thread Nikola M.
On 10/12/13 10:36 AM, Dave Koelmeyer wrote: On 12/10/13 07:06 PM, Nikola M. wrote: I also don't want *anytime* to be left with an update of Hipster that just break all everyday apps. (Plus all old apps binary compatibility) It must be considered with the rest of the apps and people that are

Re: [oi-dev] [OpenIndiana-discuss] Studio future in OI (Re: )

2013-10-13 Thread Dave Koelmeyer
On 13/10/13 07:33 PM, Nikola M. wrote: This is my intention to discuss obvious problems that Openindiana have with release management and quality control and I see no justification to ignore user requests for clear open testing process that is suppose to produce quality and improvements, not

Re: [oi-dev] Studio/GCC c++ libraries

2013-10-13 Thread Alexander Pyhalov
Jim Klimov писал 10.10.2013 14:00: On 2013-10-09 19:21, Alexander Pyhalov wrote: I propose putting G++-compiled libraries into /usr/g++ ONLY when we have to provide multiple copies of this library. So, when all system is clean from CC-compiled bits, we'll rename library/g++/X to library/X

Re: [oi-dev] [OpenIndiana-discuss] Studio future in OI (Re: )

2013-10-13 Thread Bob Friesenhahn
On Sun, 13 Oct 2013, Dave Koelmeyer wrote: state of OI in the recent past, pre-Hipster. With respect, the fact that you're getting upset about Flash player (!!) breaking - a near dead technology on a platform with a miniscule installed base - indicates to me The near dead technology is in