RE: [ANN] OJB 1.0rc7 Released

2004-06-23 Thread Phil Armour
Brian, Any word on the release announcement? -Phil -Original Message- From: Brian McCallister [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 14, 2004 9:24 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; OJB Developers List; OJB Users List Subject: [ANN] OJB 1.0rc7 Released The OJB team

Re: RC7 contains JBoss TX fix? was Re: [ANN] OJB 1.0rc7 Released

2004-06-15 Thread Armin Waibel
Hi Guido, Guido Beutler wrote: Hi, does RC7 contains the JBoss transaction fix Armin build for me? The problem was to return the JDBC Connection earlyer to avoid returning unknown connection exceptions yep! It also include another fix: PersistenceBrokerFactorySyncImpl.java now always use the same

Re: [ANN] OJB 1.0rc7 Released

2004-06-15 Thread Armin Waibel
Hi Steve, Steve Clark wrote: Brian - odmg-api: Creation of m:n relation only works when Brian objects created step by step (or use PB-api as workaround), Brian persist a whole object graph doesn't work. On delete of Brian collection objects from a m:n relation objects will be

Re: [ANN] OJB 1.0rc7 Released

2004-06-15 Thread Gary
Can someone please clarify exactly what property changed in OJB.properties as mentioned below? Thanks. - OJB.properties file has changed, don't forget to replace on update! One new property to set in managed environments. --- Brian McCallister [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The OJB team would

Re: [ANN] OJB 1.0rc7 Released

2004-06-15 Thread Steve Clark
Armin Waibel writes: Armin ooh, seems I made a mistake in the test cases repository I Armin don't specified a non-removeaware collection-class. Maybe Armin I should read the docs before I start writing the next test Armin cases ;-). Not to beat a dead horse, but I think this is

Re: [ANN] OJB 1.0rc7 Released

2004-06-15 Thread Armin Waibel
Steve Clark wrote: Armin Waibel writes: Armin ooh, seems I made a mistake in the test cases repository I Armin don't specified a non-removeaware collection-class. Maybe Armin I should read the docs before I start writing the next test Armin cases ;-). Not to beat a dead horse, but

Re: [ANN] OJB 1.0rc7 Released

2004-06-15 Thread Armin Waibel
Hi Gary, Gary wrote: Can someone please clarify exactly what property changed in OJB.properties as mentioned below? Thanks. OJB.properties file new properties: -ListProxyClass -IndirectionHandlerClass -SetProxyClass -RowReaderDefaultClass odmg specific -ImplementationClass The logging properties

Re: [ANN] OJB 1.0rc7 Released

2004-06-15 Thread Edson Carlos Ericksson Richter
To me, default doesn't matters... Just be really clear in DOCS that the changes are made, because I've a near to 265000 loc here that uses either RemovalAware and Non-RemovalAware behaviour... Best regards, Edson Richter Armin Waibel wrote: Steve Clark wrote: Armin Waibel writes: Armin

[ANN] OJB 1.0rc7 Released

2004-06-14 Thread Brian McCallister
The OJB team would like to announce the release of Apache Object/Relational Bridge (OJB) 1.0rc7. This release will hopefully be the final release candidate before version 1.0. If no major problems are discovered, OJB 1.0 will be released in one week. DOWNLOADS http://db.apache.org/builds/ojb/

Re: [ANN] OJB 1.0rc7 Released

2004-06-14 Thread Steve Clark
I'm wondering if the listed KNOWN ISSUES will be resolved for 1.0? It sounds like not, and at least one of them worries me. Brian - odmg-api: It is not possible to exchange objects in 1:n Brian references. I'm not sure what this means. Is it a new problem? Brian - odmg-api:

Re: [ANN] OJB 1.0rc7 Released

2004-06-14 Thread Armin Waibel
Hi Steve, Steve Clark wrote: I'm wondering if the listed KNOWN ISSUES will be resolved for 1.0? We try to list all unsolved major issues for 1.0 (we are open source, thus there is no reason for keep quiet about known issue). We will try to fix these problems ASAP in a 1.0x release. It sounds

Re: [ANN] OJB 1.0rc7 Released

2004-06-14 Thread Steve Clark
Brian - odmg-api: Creation of m:n relation only works when Brian objects created step by step (or use PB-api as workaround), Brian persist a whole object graph doesn't work. On delete of Brian collection objects from a m:n relation objects will be Brian deleted from the