Re: JDO status for OJB 1.0 RC5

2004-03-21 Thread Thomas Mahler
Hi Angus, Angus Berry wrote: I appreciate the insight. I understand that the JDORI plugin has some additional administrative work, but is it production stable? It is production stable. But it does not scale. The JDORI has some specific limitations that will become a problem if you run OJB/JDORI

Re: JDO status for OJB 1.0 RC5

2004-03-20 Thread Angus Berry
I appreciate the insight. I understand that the JDORI plugin has some additional administrative work, but is it production stable? Is there anyone out there using it in a serious way. thanks On Thu, 2004-03-18 at 09:02, Brian McCallister wrote: The OJB native JDO is both incomplete and

JDO status for OJB 1.0 RC5

2004-03-18 Thread Angus Berry
I wonder if some could give me a little more in depth status of JDO in RC5. Specifically, from looking at the mail archives I understand that in addition to the JDO ref. mask, there is some native JDO already implemented. So I'm wondering if what's available is buggy or just incomplete and is

Re: JDO status for OJB 1.0 RC5

2004-03-18 Thread Brian McCallister
The OJB native JDO is both incomplete and undocumented. The backend necessary to support JDO is in place (via the OTM) but I think there just hasn't been enough demand for full JDO support, yet. It is my personal goal to get a solid implementation into 1.1, but for 1.0 the JDORI plugin is the