Openness has its roots in pragmatism.
For an emphasis on the ethics and philosophy (without losing the pragmatism):
http://wikieducator.org/Say_Libre
K
On 4 May 2013 16:20, Marc Joffe wrote:
> Bastien
>
> I used Outlook and a number of other proprietary tools to build a sovereign
> fiscal data
Hi all,
The following may of interest:
Designing assessment and credit pathways for open education learners:
https://creativecommons.org/weblog/entry/26358
- links therein lead to the work being done on assessment via the OERu
(also P2PU, etc.).
On WikiEducator a quiz tool (for Mediawiki) is in
Hi Tim and all,
> However, free software is still owned by its
> creators, or potentially its assignees, and thus still has a
> proprietor. It is therefore proprietary.
We live and work within a copyright system (whether we like it or not).
The default is: (c) all rights reserved (for a very lon
e full rights that SA would otherwise grant.
Copyleft is libre by definition.
ShareAlike is not: cc-by-sa (libre), cc-by-nc-sa (non-libre).
So, "share-alike" seems like a good name for the general category that
Chris described.
Kim
---
On 14 March 2012 21:31, Ro
Hi Chris and all,
A good start! - and some great comments already :-).
A few preliminary thoughts and suggestions:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:KTucker/Sandbox/Libre
and how it would look:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:KTucker/Sandbox/Libre
Kim
--
On 5 March 2012
A few comments interspersed below.
On 9 March 2012 16:25, Chris Sakkas wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> Kim's suggested three terms for some rights reserved licences, specifically
> those that allow a work to - at a minimum - be shared verbatim by any person
> for any noncommercial purpose. They are 'share
Hi Chris and all
> Kim:
>
> I’m not married to the term ‘semi-libre’, and I’d be happy to hear
> alternatives. How about ‘pseudo-libre’?
I suspect that what you think of as semi-libre I think of as non-libre
on account of one or more restrictions (NC, ND, education only, ...).
Others have contri
Hi Peter(s) and all,
To reiterate, in this context (free/libre software, knowledge,
culture, education, ...) "libre" _is_ well defined and well understood
in many relevant circles to mean free as in freedom with a precise
meaning (links in the PS below).
Looking at Peter Suber's writings in 2008,
Hi Chris and all,
Apologies for the delay and for some repetition below.
I will start with the short answer and then try to make sense of the question.
Short answer:
> So, in summary:
> Is there a neutral term for libre and semi-libre viral licences?
First, please avoid the confusing term semi
y strive for freedom.
Overcoming the challenges and managing trade-offs is on-going.
On 4 March 2012 04:11, Mike Linksvayer wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 6:25 PM, Kim Tucker wrote:
>> PS Generic version of this response with slightly improved wording
PS Generic version of this response with slightly improved wording:
https://librelens.wordpress.com/
On 4 March 2012 01:10, Kim Tucker wrote:
> Hi Chris and all,
>
> Libre means free as in freedom.
>
> The definition is well established and may be found at:
>
> http
Hi Chris and all,
Libre means free as in freedom.
The definition is well established and may be found at:
http://freedomdefined.org/Definition
and in the context of libre knowledge:
http://wikieducator.org/Declaration_on_libre_knowledge
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Libre_Knowledge
As you kno
Hi all,
> FreeTable is presently severely lacking in data, but the hope is to
> gradually build up relevant data over time.
Would the following be useful? (in terms of sharing)
http://data.un.org/Host.aspx?Content=About
and legally compatible? (usage terms look like CC-BY)
http://data.un.org/H
Try changing "open" to "free".
When I tried, the first link was gnu.org's free licenses list followed
by an appropriate Wikipedia entry.
But "open license" comes up near the top in various forms.
http://wikieducator.org/Say_libre ! :-).
K
-
On 19 May 2011 17:25, Daniel Dietrich wrote:
>
Hi all,
The following may be of interest (free to adapt):
http://wikieducator.org/Workgroup:Amendments_to_Open_Community_Governance_Policy/2nd_Draft_Policy
(check out the "Issues" tab to see the wiki-based process followed).
WikiEducator is also considering having a code of conduct:
http://wikie
g/wiki/Free_Software_Case_Studies
or WikiEducator (login required) here:
http://wikieducator.org/Free_Software_Case_Studies/Case_Studies
The FTA will select from these and other lists.
Many thanks
Kim Tucker
E-mail via http://wikieducator.org/User:KTucker
___
okfn-d
Hi all,
For this strategic time - a reminder: the "libre perspective" which has
much to say about vision, mission, values and impact:
http://wikieducator.org/Say_Libre
http://www.libre.org/communities
Feel free to adapt anything you find useful :-)
Kim
Rufus Pollock wrote:
> Five years
Hi all,
Anyone interested in helping build this portal?
http://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/Portal:FLOSS4Science
Keep well
Kim
http://communities.libre.org/
--
This message is subject to the CSIR's copyright terms and conditions, e-mail
legal notice, and implemented Open Document Format (O
18 matches
Mail list logo
