https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=318798
Stefan Langer langer...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||langer...@gmail.com
---
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=318798
--- Comment #10 from Albert Astals Cid aa...@kde.org ---
(In reply to comment #9)
Unfortunately I do not know a single PDF viewer for Linux which can do the
following:
- easily create notes and bookmarks in PDF files (like e.g. the Foxit
reader,
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=306572
Albert Astals Cid aa...@kde.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEEDSINFO
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/109364/
---
(Updated July 21, 2013, 3:36 p.m.)
Review request for Okular and Jaydeep
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/109364/#review36250
---
Jaydeep, can you confirm you are working so that
On June 9, 2013, 10:29 p.m., Albert Astals Cid wrote:
part.cpp, line 305
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/110914/diff/1/?file=149252#file149252line305
Please avoid reformating source code, makes it harder to review
Hello? Is anyone there?
- Albert
On July 7, 2013, 10:31 p.m., Albert Astals Cid wrote:
The location of the code in pageview.cpp is therefore justified as the
image and text extract code is located in the same class. However, I agree
that pageview.cpp is rather large and should be refactored.
That is not true, the
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/111554/#review36256
---
generators/epub/converter.cpp
On July 21, 2013, 3:37 p.m., Albert Astals Cid wrote:
Jaydeep, can you confirm you are working so that
http://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=51488 can be correctly seen in a dark
colorscheme?
I tried it, with color scheme Krita-darker (background colors dark
foreground colors light).
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/111036/#review36259
---
At Akademy we held a BoF about Okular, this is the conclusion
On July 21, 2013, 4:18 p.m., Albert Astals Cid wrote:
At Akademy we held a BoF about Okular, this is the conclusion we reached,
it is a good idea to show the TOC if there's one, no need for the checkbox
Can you update the code to do that?
I certainly can, but another possibility
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=322662
Bug ID: 322662
Summary: Okular freezes when trying to print PDF
Classification: Unclassified
Product: okular
Version: 0.16.5
Platform: Archlinux Packages
OS: Linux
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=322662
Albert Astals Cid aa...@kde.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aa...@kde.org
--- Comment #1
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=322662
--- Comment #2 from Milian Wolff m...@milianw.de ---
On ArchLinux? I doubt it - but well, what is new? Here's what I have:
milian@minime:~$ okular --version
Qt: 4.8.5
KDE Development Platform: 4.10.5
Okular: 0.16.5
milian@minime:~$ pacman -Ss poppler |
14 matches
Mail list logo
