https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=476735
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan E. Snow ---
(In reply to Jonathan E. Snow from comment #0)
> SUMMARY
> ***
> NOTE: If you are reporting a crash, please try to attach a backtrace with
> debug symbols.
> See
> https://community.kde.org/Gui
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=476735
Bug ID: 476735
Summary: Okular freezes for ~30 seconds opening WAN remote
mount.
Classification: Applications
Product: okular
Version: 24.01.75
Platform: Other
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=457228
Jonathan E. Snow changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REPORTED|CONFIRMED
Ever confirmed|0
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=465196
Jonathan Ryshpan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jonr...@pacbell.net
--
You are receiving
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=465196
Bug ID: 465196
Summary: bash should complete okular README.md, but it doesn't
Classification: Applications
Product: okular
Version: 22.12.1
Platform: Other
OS: Linux
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=443707
Bug ID: 443707
Summary: Okular crashes while searching
Product: okular
Version: 21.04.1
Platform: Fedora RPMs
OS: Linux
Status: REPORTED
Keywords: drkonqi
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=432638
Jonathan Riddell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REPORTED|RESOLVED
Resolution
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=361538
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan ---
Still happens to me, at least with Okular version 1.11.3
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=426475
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Barrios ---
Oh also I found out how to add images. So they are attached above.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=426475
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Barrios ---
Created attachment 131594
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=131594=edit
This what happens when I try to open the document.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=426475
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Barrios ---
Created attachment 131593
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=131593=edit
As you can see this is a valid okular document archive, looking at the zipped
files
--
You are receiving this mail beca
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=426475
Bug ID: 426475
Summary: okular document archive can't be opened even when
saved with .okular ending
Product: okular
Version: 1.9.3
Platform: Other
OS: Linux
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=315930
Jonathan E. Snow changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jes...@uh.edu
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=394775
--- Comment #8 from Jonathan Schmidt-Dominé ---
To summarise my situation: Actually I am still using Okular 1.3. I am reading
and annotating a lot of PDFs for my work, any newer version of Okular would
completely break my workflow. I need the original
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=419394
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan ---
Created attachment 127096
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=127096=edit
pdf containing an image
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=419394
Bug ID: 419394
Summary: Provide an easy way to extract an image from a pdf
Product: okular
Version: 1.9.3
Platform: Other
OS: Linux
Status: REPORTED
Severity:
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=418496
Jonathan Riddell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|REPORTED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=418496
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Riddell ---
Sorry about that.
Can you paste the output of
snap list okular
and also of
snap run okular
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=410844
--- Comment #18 from Jonathan Riddell ---
I've added this patch to qt in neon
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
jriddell added a comment.
example app switched to common version scheme
https://phabricator.kde.org/D21091 many apps already follow this, needs
checking with maintainers and teams if it's wanted for other apps which could
be switched.
Can add-bugzilla-versions/add-versions.py be
jriddell added a comment.
the add-bugzilla-versions/add-versions.py uses a variable called
BUGZILLA_APPLICATION_VERSION but I don't see that in any application, what's a
good example?
> Which is exactly what already happens.
I see for example:
Parley has
jriddell added a comment.
Frameworks has its own release schedule and that works well. Plasma fits in
with that not the other way round.
For version numbers I think we should do as I did in Plasma and define some
cmake variables to get used then go through all the apps where nobody
jriddell added a comment.
Yeah let's not split things out into more release bundles just for the sake
of it, that increases work for no gain.
The version number issue I doubt we'll get agreement on. I do strongly feel
that unified versions for apps in KDE Applications is a necessary
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=378449
Jonathan Verner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Ever confirmed|0
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=378449
--- Comment #17 from Jonathan Verner ---
(In reply to Albert Astals Cid from comment #16)
> Pointing to lines of code is bad, he pretends like he understands the code,
> which he doesn't, so it makes him less credible.
I know some user commen
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=396681
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Schmidt-Dominé ---
Thank you very much, Nate!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=396681
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Schmidt-Dominé ---
Thanks Christoph for refering to the duplicate, I had not found it, sorry.
Would you mind telling me if there is any major problem with saving annotations
internally impeding other features? Or is it just
behaviour?
Best,
Jonathan
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=396681
Jonathan Schmidt-Dominé changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Save annotations locally|Save annotations internally
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=388228
--- Comment #8 from Jonathan Schmidt-Dominé <de...@the-user.org> ---
You are of course right. Thank you very much!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=388228
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Schmidt-Dominé <de...@the-user.org> ---
Looks like a corrupted vtable. “pure virtual method called”
==30208== Memcheck, a memory error detector
==30208== Copyright (C) 2002-2017, and GNU GPL'd, by Julian Seward
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=388228
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Schmidt-Dominé <de...@the-user.org> ---
Hi, it happens with virtually every PDF. Random example:
http://www.philipebert.info/resources/WhatMathematicalKnowledgeCouldNotBe.pdf
I highlight the word “comply” in the
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=388228
Bug ID: 388228
Summary: Okular crashes when annotating a piece of text
Product: okular
Version: 1.1.3
Platform: Ubuntu Packages
OS: Linux
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=379296
Jonathan Verner <jonathan.ver...@gmail.com> changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jonath
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=378449
Jonathan Verner <jonathan.ver...@gmail.com> changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jonath
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=363776
--- Comment #11 from Jonathan <jonat...@schultz.la> ---
I beg to differ. The failure to set d->mousePressPos is a direct consequence of
handling this particular click differently from every other one. So although
the patch removes on
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=363776
--- Comment #8 from Jonathan <jonat...@schultz.la> ---
Comment on attachment 104443
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=104443
Alberts patch to fix the problem
Sure that is a simple and effective solution to this bug. However it doe
if you can't get into full-screen
you can still use the computer, but if find yourself locked in to
full-screen then you are really blocked from doing anything.
Cheers, Jonathan
On 14/02/17 16:07, habruening wrote:
Hi Albert!
Please open okular in fullscreen mode and ask your wife or girl friend
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=363776
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan <jonat...@schultz.la> ---
Created attachment 104037
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=104037=edit
Patch to fix problem
It's not very elegant, but this patch solves the problem. It does this by
creating a
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=363776
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan <jonat...@schultz.la> ---
I just reproduced the problem once again using Okular from Debian/unstable.
I've attached a copy of the PDF and a screen capture video to demonstrate. The
important bit to notice is at 0:22 a
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=363776
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan <jonat...@schultz.la> ---
Created attachment 104034
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=104034=edit
PDF that demonstrates bug
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=376300
--- Comment #8 from Jonathan Verner <jonathan.ver...@gmail.com> ---
Oh, sorry, I missed that...
Now that I tried pringint it, my system completely locked up :-)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=376300
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Verner <jonathan.ver...@gmail.com> ---
Created attachment 104028
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=104028=edit
How it displays the pdf when forms are hidden
Works fine here
--
You are receiving
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=376300
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Verner <jonathan.ver...@gmail.com> ---
Created attachment 104027
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=104027=edit
How it displays the pdf when forms are shown
Works fine here...
--
You are receiving
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=376300
Jonathan Verner <jonathan.ver...@gmail.com> changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jonath
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=376459
Jonathan Verner <jonathan.ver...@gmail.com> changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jonath
change to GPLv2 or "GPLv2
or later".
Cheers, Jonathan
that KDE has announced a shiny new UI toolkit called Kirigami -
maybe that's the opportunity to re-write Okular's (rather clunky IMHO) UI.
Best,
Jonathan
On 14/02/17 07:13, habruening wrote:
Hi Okular developers!
I am trying to start with KDE development. It is my first open source
initiative
> On April 8, 2016, 7:52 a.m., Jonathan Schultz wrote:
> > Sorry I've been meaning to test this a bit more and only got to it today.
> >
> > I have a couple of minor comments:
> >
> > 1. The corner boxes do not seem to work - even though the mouse icon
>
> On April 8, 2016, 7:52 a.m., Jonathan Schultz wrote:
> > Sorry I've been meaning to test this a bit more and only got to it today.
> >
> > I have a couple of minor comments:
> >
> > 1. The corner boxes do not seem to work - even though the mouse icon
>
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=374133
Jonathan Riddell <j...@jriddell.org> changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|neon-b...@kde.org |okular-devel@k
, Jonathan Schultz wrote:
Looks interesting. How does it compare (performance, features, etc.)
with the Poppler plugin?
Any chance you could save us the bother of building ourselves and post a
link to an executable?
Cheers,
Jonathan
On 18/01/17 03:30, Gilbert Assaf wrote:
Hi all,
I worked
Looks interesting. How does it compare (performance, features, etc.)
with the Poppler plugin?
Any chance you could save us the bother of building ourselves and post a
link to an executable?
Cheers,
Jonathan
On 18/01/17 03:30, Gilbert Assaf wrote:
Hi all,
I worked on an okular pdf plugin
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=373855
Jonathan Verner <jonathan.ver...@gmail.com> changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jonath
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=372917
Jonathan Riddell <j...@jriddell.org> changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||j...@jridde
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=372825
Jonathan Riddell <j...@jriddell.org> changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |CON
still appears next to
it? Should I be worried that someone has taken over my account? Or is this a
bug in reviewboard? Or is this how reviewboard functions?
- Jonathan Verner
On Nov. 3, 2016, 7:30 a.m., Jonathan Verner wrote
there something that you think should be done soon, or as next change?
> If not I'll just go on with what comes to my mind, and will probably update
> here in 1..2 weeks.
>
> Btw., sorry, I don't know how inline quote here (using the reviewboard
> webinterface).
>
>
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=366785
Jonathan Verner <jonathan.ver...@gmail.com> changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jonath
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=365993
Jonathan Verner <jonathan.ver...@gmail.com> changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jonath
and people (including me)
have a lot of other things to do, but still: is there anything else that needs
to be fixed in this patch? Is my explanation of the usecase clear and
convincing enough?
- Jonathan Verner
On April 6, 2016, 8:01 p.m., Jonathan Verner wrote
with annotation revisions.
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/media/uploaded/files/2016/04/11/2f84d42c-e317-4d3e-968b-8b873945d51a__test.pdf
Thanks,
Jonathan Verner
___
Okular-devel mailing list
Okular-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=365843
Jonathan Verner <jonathan.ver...@gmail.com> changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jonath
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=365806
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Verner <jonathan.ver...@gmail.com> ---
P.S. It works for me (Kubuntu 14.04, Qt: 4.8.6, KDE Development Platform:
4.14.13, Okular: 0.20.3)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for t
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=365806
Jonathan Verner <jonathan.ver...@gmail.com> changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jonath
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=363776
Bug ID: 363776
Summary: Text selection begins prematurely following change to
tool
Product: okular
Version: unspecified
Platform: unspecified
OS: Linux
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=361538
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan <jonat...@imatix.com> ---
Created attachment 98954
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=98954=edit
Problem doesn't happen with PDF.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee fo
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=361538
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan <jonat...@imatix.com> ---
Created attachment 98952
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=98952=edit
A trivial test file where the issue can be reproduced.
I notice that the problem does not happen with
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=306886
Jonathan <jonat...@imatix.com> changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jonat...@imat
/uploaded/files/2016/04/11/2f84d42c-e317-4d3e-968b-8b873945d51a__test.pdf
Thanks,
Jonathan Verner
___
Okular-devel mailing list
Okular-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/okular-devel
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=361644
Bug ID: 361644
Summary: Improve review workflow
Product: okular
Version: 0.24.0
Platform: Compiled Sources
OS: Linux
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: wishlist
that they can be edited and
properly saved back.
File Attachments (updated)
Test file with annotation revisions.
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/media/uploaded/files/2016/04/11/2f84d42c-e317-4d3e-968b-8b873945d51a__test.pdf
Thanks,
Jonathan Verner
back.
Thanks,
Jonathan Verner
___
Okular-devel mailing list
Okular-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/okular-devel
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=361538
Bug ID: 361538
Summary: Text selection misses some characters
Product: okular
Version: unspecified
Platform: Other
OS: Linux
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
t merging?
I think you are way ahead of me, and I am looking forward to going over your
patch to learn how to do a few things. That said, I have contributed one tiny
review request: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/127496/ but haven't had any
response yet.
- Jonathan Schultz
On April 5, 2016, 8:02
a044895c1935c587552e875a98627e58d19ed443
Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/127541/diff/
Testing
---
Tested both manually on several files and also provided a simple automatic test
in mainshelltest.cpp.
Thanks,
Jonathan Verner
___
Okular-devel mailing list
org/r/127541/#comment64092>
`m_fileformatsscanned` has to be valid at this moment and even if it were
not, the else block would fail (This is not strictly related to the feature,
but as I was refactoring the code anyway, I decided to get rid of this.).
- Jonathan Verner
On April 5, 2
e a
windows computer handy to test it). On the other hand it sure does not need to
feature so prominently in the file menu. Perhaps it would better fit into the
Tools or Edit menus?
- Jonathan
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. T
/mainshelltest.cpp a044895c1935c587552e875a98627e58d19ed443
Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/127541/diff/
Testing
---
Tested both manually on several files and also provided a simple automatic test
in mainshelltest.cpp.
Thanks,
Jonathan Verner
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=361292
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Verner <jonathan.ver...@gmail.com> ---
I tried implementing the feature; see:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/127541/
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for t
://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/127541/diff/
Testing
---
Tested both manually on several files and also provided a simple automatic test
in mainshelltest.cpp.
Thanks,
Jonathan Verner
___
Okular-devel mailing list
Okular-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=361292
Bug ID: 361292
Summary: Import annotations from a different file
Product: okular
Version: 0.24.0
Platform: Other
OS: Linux
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
---
Thanks,
Jonathan Schultz
___
Okular-devel mailing list
Okular-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/okular-devel
that contains the comment '// If
nothing else going on, process right click as normal'
Diffs
-
ui/pageview.cpp 3ebf7dc
Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/127496/diff/
Testing
---
Thanks,
Jonathan Schultz
___
Okular-devel mailing list
a lot in terms what it lets the user do, but agree that the use of
the Control key is a bit unusual. I also have an interest in this because it
overlaps with stuff I am working on to do more with selections.
My sense is that annotations should be select-able, by left-clicking on some
obvious part of
am happy to invest some time and energy both in learning and
in building and testing various solutions.
Cheers,
Jonathan
On 10/03/16 21:01, Thomas Friedrichsmeier wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, 10 Mar 2016 01:19:39 +0100
Albert Astals Cid <aa...@kde.org> wrote:
El Wednesday 09 March 2016, a les 17
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=360201
Jonathan Verner <jonathan.ver...@gmail.com> changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jonath
Cheers, Jonathan
3. For some reason that I have no idea of, the build process (I'm using
emerge) produces a dynamic library called libokularpart.dll, but the
executable tries to find a library called okularpart.dll. Simply
renaming the built library works as a work-around.
With those changes
for a later post.
Best,
Jonathan
___
Okular-devel mailing list
Okular-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/okular-devel
On 29/02/16 10:08, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
El Monday 29 February 2016, a les 09:13:10, Jonathan Schultz va escriure:
They operate differently because they do different things, after drawing
the rectange there's nothing else you want to do so the menu is triggered
immediately.
I differ
clear room for improvement here, I thought I would like to raise this as
a topic for discussion.
I find they are quite consistent in how you want to use them.
Cheers,
Albert
Best,
Jonathan
I would like to suggest that the operation be standardised around the
current behaviour in text
://mail.kde.org/pipermail/okular-devel/2015-November/021920.html
and the code itself here: https://github.com/jschultz/okular-tagging
Cheers,
Jonathan
___
Okular-devel mailing list
Okular-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/okular-devel
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=359242
Jonathan Verner <jonathan.ver...@gmail.com> changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jonath
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=358764
Jonathan Verner <jonathan.ver...@gmail.com> changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jonath
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=358634
Jonathan Verner <jonathan.ver...@gmail.com> changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jonath
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=319839
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Verner <jonathan.ver...@gmail.com> ---
(In reply to Walter Rudametkin from comment #3)
> Hi,
>
> Is there anything missing for your patch to be applied? I'd really like to
> see this in Ok
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=358371
Jonathan Verner <jonathan.ver...@gmail.com> changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jonath
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=358371
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Verner <jonathan.ver...@gmail.com> ---
Created attachment 96814
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=96814=edit
Okular 0.20.3 showing the form fields
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=358371
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Verner <jonathan.ver...@gmail.com> ---
(In reply to wgzimmer-zueri from comment #4)
> (In reply to Jonathan Verner from comment #2)
> > Works for me, here (Ubuntu 14.04, Okular 0.20.3). When I op
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=358371
--- Comment #8 from Jonathan Verner <jonathan.ver...@gmail.com> ---
> Now that you mention it, I just checked with evince and have the same
> troubles there. Should I maybe file this as an XFCE bug?
>
> I appear to have poppler libr
1 - 100 of 261 matches
Mail list logo
