[Okular-devel] [Bug 176743] okular review affects different document with same name

2008-12-08 Thread doc.evans
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=176743 --- Comment #5 from doc evans gmail com 2008-12-08 22:21:48 --- It sounds like the "okular archive" might solve one problem (the one I have at the moment: that I want multiple identical files, with identical names, to be associated with different rev

[Okular-devel] [Bug 176743] okular review affects different document with same name

2008-12-08 Thread Albert Astals Cid
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=176743 --- Comment #4 from Albert Astals Cid 2008-12-08 20:16:55 --- Pino, he said "five identical files", so yes, the file size is the same too. As said, identical files with the same name are the same file to okular in the regard of reviews. This is a

[Okular-devel] [Bug 176743] okular review affects different document with same name

2008-12-08 Thread Pino Toscano
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=176743 --- Comment #3 from Pino Toscano 2008-12-08 20:12:07 --- (In reply to comment #2) > You are saying, I think, that the designed behaviour is that if I have five > identical files on my system, all with the same name but in different > directories, th

[Okular-devel] [Bug 176743] okular review affects different document with same name

2008-12-08 Thread doc.evans
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=176743 --- Comment #2 from doc evans gmail com 2008-12-08 20:01:58 --- Let me be sure I understand what you're saying. I apologize if I am misunderstanding. You are saying, I think, that the designed behaviour is that if I have five identical files on my s

[Okular-devel] [Bug 176743] okular review affects different document with same name

2008-12-08 Thread Albert Astals Cid
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=176743 --- Comment #1 from Albert Astals Cid 2008-12-08 17:36:32 --- That's how it works by design. Given that reviews are not saved inside the file it's the only way you have not to lose the reviews when you move files. -- Configure bugmail: http://bu