[Okular-devel] [okular] [Bug 186797] remove review term and use annotations consistently
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=186797 Gregor Mi codestr...@posteo.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||codestr...@posteo.org -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Okular-devel mailing list Okular-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/okular-devel
[Okular-devel] [okular] [Bug 247800] make highlighted annotation box configurable
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=247800 Gregor Mi codestr...@posteo.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||codestr...@posteo.org -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Okular-devel mailing list Okular-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/okular-devel
[Okular-devel] [okular] [Bug 304736] Do not remove documents from 'Open Recent' if they are on a drive that is not mounted
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=304736 Gregor Mi codestr...@posteo.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||codestr...@posteo.org --- Comment #5 from Gregor Mi codestr...@posteo.org --- In okular 0.20.3 I observe the following behaviour for a given file: A) 1) The file is present in the Open Recent list. 2) Close okular. 3) Delete the file. 4) Open okular. = The file is _silently_ removed from the Open Recent list. B) 1) The file is present in the Open Recent list. 2) Do not close okular. 3) Delete the file. 4) Click the corresponding entry in the Open Recent list. = A message box appears Could not open [...] and the file is removed silently from the Open Recent list. In case A) okular could act as in case B) but then _ask the user_ if the entry should be deleted. The silent entry deletion behaviour can also be observed in other applications like Callligra Words. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Okular-devel mailing list Okular-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/okular-devel
[Okular-devel] [okular] [Bug 177778] make it possible to resize resizable annotations
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18 Gregor Mi codestr...@posteo.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||codestr...@posteo.org -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Okular-devel mailing list Okular-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/okular-devel
[Okular-devel] [okular] [Bug 314843] Allow resizing of stamp annotations
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=314843 Gregor Mi codestr...@posteo.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||codestr...@posteo.org --- Comment #5 from Gregor Mi codestr...@posteo.org --- see also https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Okular-devel mailing list Okular-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/okular-devel
[Okular-devel] [okular] [Bug 177778] make it possible to resize resizable annotations
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18 Johannes Simon johannes.si...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|johannes.si...@gmail.com| -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Okular-devel mailing list Okular-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/okular-devel
[Okular-devel] [okular] [Bug 333981] improve annotation movement feedback performance
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=333981 Gregor Mi codestr...@posteo.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||codestr...@posteo.org --- Comment #2 from Gregor Mi codestr...@posteo.org --- The bug report sounds like it is possible to move annotations. I use version 0.20.3. Is it still possible to move an annotation once it has been placed on the document? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Okular-devel mailing list Okular-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/okular-devel
[Okular-devel] [okular] [Bug 315552] Allow save annotations directly to original pdf file
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=315552 Gregor Mi codestr...@posteo.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||codestr...@posteo.org -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Okular-devel mailing list Okular-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/okular-devel
[Okular-devel] [okular] [Bug 341999] New: Annotations/Review disabled on encrypted PDF file
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=341999 Bug ID: 341999 Summary: Annotations/Review disabled on encrypted PDF file Product: okular Version: 0.20.3 Platform: openSUSE RPMs OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: minor Priority: NOR Component: general Assignee: okular-devel@kde.org Reporter: codestr...@posteo.org I would like to annotate a PDF document with okular but the Tools -- Review F6 menu is grayed out. Is this maybe so because the PDF file is encrypted (see Properties - Security: Encrypted, Format: PDF v. 1.4)? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Okular-devel mailing list Okular-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/okular-devel
[Okular-devel] [okular] [Bug 341999] Annotations/Review disabled on encrypted PDF file
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=341999 Albert Astals Cid aa...@kde.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEEDSINFO CC||aa...@kde.org Resolution|--- |WAITINGFORINFO --- Comment #1 from Albert Astals Cid aa...@kde.org --- Can you attach the file? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Okular-devel mailing list Okular-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/okular-devel
[Okular-devel] [okular] [Bug 333981] improve annotation movement feedback performance
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=333981 --- Comment #3 from Albert Astals Cid aa...@kde.org --- Gregor: Read the manual -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Okular-devel mailing list Okular-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/okular-devel
[Okular-devel] [okular] [Bug 341999] Annotations/Review disabled on encrypted PDF file
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=341999 --- Comment #2 from Gregor Mi codestr...@posteo.org --- Thanks for quick reply. The PDF in question comes from my bank, so sorry for not attaching it. I try to find a similar one. I will attach a screenshot of the properties dialog for now. I just found another encrypted PDF where annotations are possible. So it is not necessarily because of the encryption. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Okular-devel mailing list Okular-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/okular-devel
[Okular-devel] [okular] [Bug 341999] Annotations/Review disabled on encrypted PDF file
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=341999 --- Comment #3 from Gregor Mi codestr...@posteo.org --- Created attachment 90035 -- https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=90035action=edit properties window screenshot properties window of PDF where no annotations are possible -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Okular-devel mailing list Okular-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/okular-devel
[Okular-devel] [okular] [Bug 341999] Annotations/Review disabled on encrypted PDF file
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=341999 --- Comment #4 from Albert Astals Cid aa...@kde.org --- of course it's not because of that, it's most probably because the file has the no annotate bit on. You can decide to not follow DRM limitations on the config dialog -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Okular-devel mailing list Okular-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/okular-devel
[Okular-devel] [okular] [Bug 341999] Annotations/Review disabled on DRM protected PDF file
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=341999 Gregor Mi codestr...@posteo.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|WAITINGFORINFO |FIXED Summary|Annotations/Review disabled |Annotations/Review disabled |on encrypted PDF file |on DRM protected PDF file Status|NEEDSINFO |RESOLVED --- Comment #5 from Gregor Mi codestr...@posteo.org --- :-) I found the option. Now it works smoothly. Thanks! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. Make the world a better place. Donate to our year end fundraiser https://www.kde.org/fundraisers/yearend2014/ ___ Okular-devel mailing list Okular-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/okular-devel
[Okular-devel] [okular] [Bug 333981] improve annotation movement feedback performance
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=333981 --- Comment #4 from Gregor Mi codestr...@posteo.org --- Ok, it's the Ctrl key + left mouse button click. Good to know. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Okular-devel mailing list Okular-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/okular-devel
[Okular-devel] [okular] [Bug 342002] New: Whish: Split view in Okular
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=342002 Bug ID: 342002 Summary: Whish: Split view in Okular Product: okular Version: unspecified Platform: Other OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: wishlist Priority: NOR Component: general Assignee: okular-devel@kde.org Reporter: fl...@mailoo.org When reading a complex document with multiple references (e.g. Figures, Bibliography), it could be useful to have a split view implemented in Okular so as to be able to consult two different parts of the document at the same time. This would render the checking of bibliography in scientific papers/reports much easier for example. Reproducible: Always -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Okular-devel mailing list Okular-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/okular-devel
[Okular-devel] [okular] [Bug 342002] Whish: Split view in Okular
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=342002 fl...@mailoo.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||fl...@mailoo.org -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Okular-devel mailing list Okular-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/okular-devel
[Okular-devel] [okular] [Bug 342002] Whish: Split view in Okular
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=342002 Christoph Feck christ...@maxiom.de changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE --- Comment #1 from Christoph Feck christ...@maxiom.de --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 169847 *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Okular-devel mailing list Okular-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/okular-devel
[Okular-devel] [okular] [Bug 342003] New: Trim margins confuses ordering of zoom steps while zooming out
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=342003 Bug ID: 342003 Summary: Trim margins confuses ordering of zoom steps while zooming out Product: okular Version: 0.20.2 Platform: Debian unstable OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: NOR Component: general Assignee: okular-devel@kde.org Reporter: co...@online.de While trim margins is active it is no longer possible to Zoom Out past the Fit Width state. Instead pressing Zoom Out (or Strg- -) repeatedly alternates between the next smaller zoom level and the Fit Width zoom level. This regression appeared recently, when Fit Width zoom level was sorted into the list of zoom states one reaches with Zoom In and Zoom Out. Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. Activate Trim margins 2. Zoom to Fit Width 3. Zoom Out (Strg - -) repeatedly Actual Results: Zoom level alternates between Fit Width and the next smaller one (f.ex. 75%). Expected Results: Zoom out continuously. I quite like the behaviour without Trim Margins. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Okular-devel mailing list Okular-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/okular-devel
[Okular-devel] [okular] [Bug 333981] improve annotation movement feedback performance
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=333981 --- Comment #5 from Barade barade.bar...@web.de --- btw. you could allow selecting and unselecting annotations (double clicking) and then allow movement. For myself it was hard to find out how to move them too because like Gregor I wasn't even aware of that feature so I didn't look into the manual at the first place. You could add a context menu entry as well. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Okular-devel mailing list Okular-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/okular-devel
[Okular-devel] [okular] [Bug 326522] allow to disable automatic search while typing in okulars search field
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=326522 firewalker firew4l...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||firew4l...@gmail.com --- Comment #4 from firewalker firew4l...@gmail.com --- Also if you accidentally make a mistake to the search term the End of document reached will pop-up, witch is really annoying. http://i.imgur.com/1ROtMGC.png -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Okular-devel mailing list Okular-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/okular-devel
