https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=492358
Oliver Sander changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||oliver.san...@tu-dresden.de
--- Comment #2
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=491780
Oliver Sander changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||oliver.san...@tu-dresden.de
--- Comment #3
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=486681
--- Comment #3 from Oliver Sander ---
Thank you! Please also attach the LaTeX source file.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=486681
Oliver Sander changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||oliver.san...@tu-dresden.de
--- Comment #1
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=482363
--- Comment #11 from Oliver Sander ---
Is this maybe a font issue? Because I do see the checkmark in the box even
with disabled 'forms' mode.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=482363
--- Comment #8 from Oliver Sander ---
Do you have access to Adobe professional? Then you could try to strip the
problematic of all the confidential parts. Really, the/a file is needed to fix
this.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=482363
Oliver Sander changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||oliver.san...@tu-dresden.de
--- Comment #6
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=478540
Oliver Sander changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||oliver.san...@tu-dresden.de
--- Comment #1
I'm also trying to flip it around a bit. If this was proposed today where we
have a postscript generator in okular, would we accept this feature?
Also, don't you get the same functionality by loading the postscript as
postscript,
and then printing it to a file (at least in principle)? I'd con
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=474889
Bug ID: 474889
Summary: Form field misuse leads to 'NaN' which won't disappear
Classification: Applications
Product: okular
Version: 23.08.1
Platform: Other
OS: Linux
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=474888
--- Comment #1 from Oliver Sander ---
Created attachment 161879
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=161879&action=edit
Acrobat security settings
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=474888
Bug ID: 474888
Summary: Signing requires (empty) password in document that has
password-restriction for modification
Classification: Applications
Product: okular
Version: unspecified
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=465055
--- Comment #24 from Oliver Sander ---
I would still be interested to see what your Utils::realDpi method does. Have
you been able to get your local Okular to link yet?
Looking at the code again I see that if the system reports different dpi for x
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=471422
Oliver Sander changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||oliver.san...@tu-dresden.de
Ever confirmed
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=470734
Oliver Sander changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||oliver.san...@tu-dresden.de
--- Comment #2
No problems, I've reached out to a company we've previously had
discussions with - if that's not fruitful, do you have any specific
recommendations? (Happy if you'd prefer to email me directly/off list)
My employer has hired KDAB [CCed] several times for Okular/Poppler work,
and we have always b
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=126942
Oliver Sander changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||oliver.san...@tu-dresden.de
--- Comment #3
Hi Bernard,
Turns out, there was already a bug raised in 2006(!):
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=126942
thanks for finding this.
I've added links back to this mailing list thread - is there any way I
am able to raise the profile of this ticket to get it looked at
(beyond having this di
Bernard, can you explain more precisely what it is that you need?
Without it I don't think you will get a better answer.
Sorry for this: I just found your last email which gives more information.
Let me digest those first.
Maybe open a feature request at bugs.kde.org -- that's more easily kept
Hi,
poppler does have overprinting support (to a certain extent). See for example
the manpage of pdftops.
Bernard, can you explain more precisely what it is that you need?
Without it I don't think you will get a better answer.
Maybe open a feature request at bugs.kde.org -- that's more easily
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=470108
Oliver Sander changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||oliver.san...@tu-dresden.de
--- Comment #1
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=465055
--- Comment #21 from Oliver Sander ---
Did you get Okular to build and link on your computer in the meantime? My
apologies, but I am not the one who can help with linker problems.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=461371
--- Comment #5 from Oliver Sander ---
I asked the colleague I mentioned above to test this, and it seems that the
issue is indeed fixed for us as well. Thank you!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=469044
Oliver Sander changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||oliver.san...@tu-dresden.de
--- Comment #1
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=468819
Oliver Sander changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||oliver.san...@tu-dresden.de
--- Comment #3
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=468112
Oliver Sander changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||oliver.san...@tu-dresden.de
--- Comment #2
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=468017
Oliver Sander changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||oliver.san...@tu-dresden.de
--- Comment #1
Thank you Albert. The pdf file is not relevant here though. Not when other
viewers such as xpdf handle the file without a problem.
The pdf file is certainly relevant. It is very difficult to fix a crash
in a particular file without having the file.
Please open an issue on bugs.kde.org and att
Hi Guillaume,
most of what is missing has been implemented in
https://invent.kde.org/graphics/okular/-/merge_requests/537
Best,
Oliver
On 15.03.23 18:31, Guillaume Gheysen wrote:
Dear Okular developers,
I am using Okular to e-sign documents (using Belgian Eid) and I really
appreciate your
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=467328
--- Comment #13 from Oliver Sander ---
1) Yes, poppler is used
2) On Windows, rasterization resolution follows the printer. Elsewhere, 300dpi
is hardcoded.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=467328
--- Comment #6 from Oliver Sander ---
I fully agree that `force rasterization` is only a workaround.
Okular currently converts pdf files to postscript and sends that to the printer
(I forgot why exactly). Presumably it is the conversion step that goes
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=467328
Oliver Sander changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||oliver.san...@tu-dresden.de
--- Comment #4
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=459174
Oliver Sander changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||oliver.san...@tu-dresden.de
--- Comment #8
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=465055
--- Comment #15 from Oliver Sander ---
Building Okular is described at https://okular.kde.org/build-it/
> But I guess, when I compile my own okular, it will display a circle -
> murphy's law :-)
That's possible. But then you will h
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=465055
--- Comment #13 from Oliver Sander ---
Relax. This is just very difficult to debug without being able to reproduce it
locally.
Access to dpi information is gathered in the method `realDpi` in the file
`utils.cpp`. Are you able to build your own
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=465055
--- Comment #8 from Oliver Sander ---
What happens when you swap the monitors?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=465055
Oliver Sander changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||oliver.san...@tu-dresden.de
--- Comment #6
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=464716
Oliver Sander changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|REPORTED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=443403
Oliver Sander changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||oliver.san...@tu-dresden.de
--- Comment #15
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=423360
--- Comment #9 from Oliver Sander ---
Is this still an issue now that
https://invent.kde.org/graphics/okular/-/merge_requests/665 has been merged?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=460681
Oliver Sander changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|REPORTED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=462579
Oliver Sander changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|WAITINGFORINFO |FIXED
CC
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=457739
Oliver Sander changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Latest Commit
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=462304
--- Comment #7 from Oliver Sander ---
Yes please. You should be able to reproduce the bug with the `pdftoppm` tool
(which is part of poppler). That way, your bug report becomes independent from
Okular.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=462304
Oliver Sander changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||oliver.san...@tu-dresden.de
--- Comment #5
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=436742
Oliver Sander changed:
What|Removed |Added
Latest Commit||https://invent.kde.org/grap
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=315930
Oliver Sander changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||oliver.san...@tu-dresden.de
--- Comment #11
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=461371
Oliver Sander changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||oliver.san...@tu-dresden.de
Status
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=460681
Oliver Sander changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||oliver.san...@tu-dresden.de
--- Comment #1
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=458723
Oliver Sander changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||oliver.san...@tu-dresden.de
--- Comment #7
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=458722
Oliver Sander changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||oliver.san...@tu-dresden.de
--- Comment #5
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=455115
Oliver Sander changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||oliver.san...@tu-dresden.de
--- Comment #6
Hi John-Albert,
for me, highlighting only goes off if I *right*-click
in the document. Left- and middle-clicks keep the highlighter
selected.
Do you happen to use a fairly old version of Okular?
The annotation GUI got a big rewrite a while ago.
Please get a recent version of Okular and try that
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=449717
Oliver Sander changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||oliver.san...@tu-dresden.de
--- Comment #4
sander added a comment.
Step 1 would be to open a merge request at
https://invent.kde.org/graphics/okular/-/merge_requests . Can you do that?
REPOSITORY
R223 Okular
REVISION DETAIL
https://phabricator.kde.org/D10455
To: fahadalsaidi, #okular, aacid, ltoscano
Cc: sander, guysoft, davidh
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=383651
--- Comment #33 from Oliver Sander ---
If all you need is printing, then enabling 'force rasterization' in the print
dialog will probably circumvent the problem for you.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=450887
Oliver Sander changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||oliver.san...@tu-dresden.de
--- Comment #1
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=449808
Oliver Sander changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REPORTED|RESOLVED
Resolution
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=449043
--- Comment #6 from Oliver Sander ---
I confirm this. Underlining both lines separately makes both underlines thin.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=449043
--- Comment #4 from Oliver Sander ---
Created attachment 145852
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=145852&action=edit
Small pdf file showing the problem
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=449043
Oliver Sander changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REPORTED|CONFIRMED
Ever confirmed|0
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=448735
--- Comment #3 from Oliver Sander ---
I don't have a Windows machine to test with anyways. Can you, by any chance,
embed some file in a test pdf file on Windows and upload that? That should
fail on my Linux, right?
--
You are receiving this
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=448735
Oliver Sander changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||oliver.san...@tu-dresden.de
--- Comment #1
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=448448
Oliver Sander changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||oliver.san...@tu-dresden.de
--- Comment #1
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=447589
Oliver Sander changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |NOT A BUG
Status|REPORTED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=446549
--- Comment #5 from Oliver Sander ---
I understand your point, but please no additional dialog box. It would mean an
additional click for everyone.
How about:
* An additional menu entry like "graphically sign" right next to "digit
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=446549
Oliver Sander changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||oliver.san...@tu-dresden.de
--- Comment #2
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=443446
--- Comment #3 from Oliver Sander ---
I think you can already have such a button. Go to preference -> toolbar
settings -> anotation toolbar, and there should be 'forward' and 'backward'
actions.
[The menu names may be slight
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=443446
Oliver Sander changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||oliver.san...@tu-dresden.de
--- Comment #1
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=442280
--- Comment #26 from Oliver Sander ---
Can you guys please move the mupdf discussion elsewhere? While it is certainly
interesting, it is only tangentially related to this bug.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=442280
Oliver Sander changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||oliver.san...@tu-dresden.de
--- Comment #10
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=420571
Oliver Sander changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||oliver.san...@tu-dresden.de
--- Comment #4
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=409644
--- Comment #11 from Oliver Sander ---
> Why is devicePixelRatio here forced to be 1...?
That part of the code was reworked in a recent merge request. Maybe it'll help
you:
https://invent.kde.org/graphics/okular/-/merge_requests/371
--
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=409644
Oliver Sander changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||oliver.san...@tu-dresden.de
--- Comment #6
Hi Julius,
The instructions say to run this command at one point:
cmake -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=/path/to/your/install/dir ..
I googled around a bit and my understanding is that there is a particular
directory where system-wide installations are put - is that /local, on Ubuntu,
or something els
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=438980
--- Comment #14 from Oliver Sander ---
> But not in 20.12 maybe?
No, not in 20.12. And I never tested it myself on Windows.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=438980
--- Comment #12 from Oliver Sander ---
> Okular uses qApp->devicePixelRatio() in some places to get the screen scaling.
I thought I fixed all that, but I may be wrong. The only remaining
per-screen-scaling issue I know of is
https://invent.k
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=438980
--- Comment #9 from Oliver Sander ---
What about the nightly builds mentioned at
https://okular.kde.org/download/
?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=438980
Oliver Sander changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|WAITINGFORINFO |---
Status|NEEDSINFO
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=438980
--- Comment #5 from Oliver Sander ---
Is it blurry on both monitors? Is it blurry if you set scaling to 100%?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=438980
Oliver Sander changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||oliver.san...@tu-dresden.de
--- Comment #1
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=438923
Oliver Sander changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||oliver.san...@tu-dresden.de
--- Comment #7
Hi Cornelius,
that sounds like a worthy goal. Thanks for all your effort!
Best,
Oliver
On 12.06.21 14:40, Cornelius Schumacher wrote:
Dear Okular developers,
you might have heard about the Blue Angel[1]. It's an ecolabel which is awarded
by the German government for environmentally friendly
Hi Mario,
XFA forms are not part of the PDF standard, and supporting them would be a lot
of work.
Besides, they are deprecated in PDF 2.0:
https://www.pdfa.org/pdf-2-0-the-worldwide-standard-for-electronic-documents-has-evolved/
In other words, support for them in Okular is very unlikely to
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=437926
Oliver Sander changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||oliver.san...@tu-dresden.de
--- Comment #6
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=436709
Oliver Sander changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||oliver.san...@tu-dresden.de
--- Comment #1
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=436301
Oliver Sander changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |NOT A BUG
Status|REPORTED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=436301
Oliver Sander changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||oliver.san...@tu-dresden.de
--- Comment #1
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=402017
Oliver Sander changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||oliver.san...@tu-dresden.de
--- Comment #66
Hi Kurt,
please file a bug report at https://bugs.kde.org , and attach the file (if
possible).
Best regards,
Oliver
On 14.04.21 22:18, Kurt v. Sengbusch wrote:
I am using Okular 20.04.2 as distributed with OpenSuse Leap 15.2
Unlike with acroread (windows 7) I cannot access links embedded with
Hi Energo,
So I want to use Ocular engine. This brings to me few questions:
1. Is this possible in theory?
Your 2 sentence description is very vague, so maybe? don't know? no idea, and
to be honest, don't really care.
that's a bit harsh. What Okular can do for you is show various file for
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=435669
Oliver Sander changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||oliver.san...@tu-dresden.de
--- Comment #1
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=435568
--- Comment #4 from Oliver Sander ---
Yes, it was more subtle than simply "the buttons are wrong". Without testing
again I think what happened was that the dialog was wrong when opened for the
first time after program start. When opened ag
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=435568
Oliver Sander changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||oliver.san...@tu-dresden.de
--- Comment #2
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=435120
Oliver Sander changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||oliver.san...@tu-dresden.de
--- Comment #10
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=434613
Oliver Sander changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||oliver.san...@tu-dresden.de
--- Comment #2
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=434111
Oliver Sander changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||oliver.san...@tu-dresden.de
--- Comment #1
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=432738
--- Comment #7 from Oliver Sander ---
Hard to tell. It's a pretty fragile construction. Unfortunately I am not
skilled enough to help you debug this.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=432159
--- Comment #3 from Oliver Sander ---
See https://invent.kde.org/graphics/okular/-/merge_requests/368 (which is think
is related).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=433003
--- Comment #2 from Oliver Sander ---
See
https://invent.kde.org/graphics/okular/-/merge_requests/368
Doesn't fix the problem reported here, but it is related.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
1 - 100 of 1015 matches
Mail list logo
