https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=407998
--- Comment #16 from Michael Weghorn ---
(In reply to Éric Brunet from comment #15)
> (In reply to Michael Weghorn from comment #11)
> > This is https://phabricator.kde.org/D10974 and I quickly verified that
> > current development version of Okular
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=407998
Éric Brunet changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||eric.bru...@lps.ens.fr
--- Comment #15 from Éric
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=407998
--- Comment #14 from Nate Graham ---
(In reply to Sergio from comment #13)
> Bad news: as of Okular 1.7.2 it is possible to require no scaling by also
> asking for rasterization, but unfortunately this causes the page to get
> printed with a
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=407998
--- Comment #13 from Sergio ---
Bad news: as of Okular 1.7.2 it is possible to require no scaling by also
asking for rasterization, but unfortunately this causes the page to get printed
with a significant offset to the right. Sending the page to the
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=407998
--- Comment #12 from Nate Graham ---
Ah perfect, I forgot that it was already committed!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=407998
Michael Weghorn changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||m.wegh...@posteo.de
--- Comment #11 from
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=407998
--- Comment #10 from Nate Graham ---
(In reply to Sergio from comment #9)
> I have finally managed installing a recent version of okular (1.7.2). The
> operation of the scaling menu is a bit unclear to me, though.
>
> 1. It is presented as a PDF
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=407998
--- Comment #9 from Sergio ---
I have finally managed installing a recent version of okular (1.7.2). The
operation of the scaling menu is a bit unclear to me, though.
1. It is presented as a PDF option, but okular supports many more formats. For
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=407998
--- Comment #8 from Nate Graham ---
Darn. That would be a good bug to file against Neon | Snaps.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=407998
--- Comment #7 from Sergio ---
Wanted to give 1.7.x a try and tried installing the snap. That does not work,
though.
t.qpa.xcb: could not connect to display :0
qt.qpa.plugin: Could not load the Qt platform plugin "xcb" in "" even though it
was found.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=407998
--- Comment #6 from Sergio ---
On 28/05/19 23:51, Nate Graham wrote:
> https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=407998
>
> --- Comment #5 from Nate Graham ---
>> I find it strange that they do not do so for KDE Applications
> I suspect that it's
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=407998
--- Comment #5 from Nate Graham ---
> I find it strange that they do not do so for KDE Applications
I suspect that it's partially a resourcing issue and partially because
there's much less urgency compared to a web browser, which is the #1 attack
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=407998
--- Comment #4 from Sergio ---
I was expecting something like that.
There is a lot of other software that has a similar development model and for
them in many notable cases distros make the choice of "following the most
recent stable" even if they are
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=407998
Nate Graham changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDSINFO |RESOLVED
Resolution|WAITINGFORINFO
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=407998
--- Comment #2 from Sergio ---
Cannot believe I posted all the versions of Qt, plasma, KDE framework and I
forgot the version of okular! Sorry about that.
It is 1.4.3, rather dated. Looks like ubuntu provides up to date plasma and
framework via its
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=407998
Nate Graham changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WAITINGFORINFO
Status|REPORTED
16 matches
Mail list logo
