Re: [ol-discuss] Ol-discuss Digest, Vol 88, Issue 1

2015-07-02 Thread Charles Horn
On 30 June 2015 at 03:00, jessamyn c. west jessa...@gmail.com wrote: Apologies for a late reply, it seems like you've done some great work. We can work to update the documentation. Thanks, I'm happy to be able to help out! What should people like me who want to contribute to the codebase

Re: [ol-discuss] Ol-discuss Digest, Vol 88, Issue 1

2015-07-02 Thread Karen Coyle
On 7/2/15 4:35 AM, Charles Horn wrote: I'm worried now that getting updates released might be a much harder goal that getting code merged if there aren't any IA devs to oversee the release process, or support if something should go wrong. Merging code on github is one thing, getting it

Re: [ol-discuss] Ol-discuss Digest, Vol 88, Issue 1

2015-07-02 Thread Anand
On 02-Jul-2015, at 8:47 pm, jessamyn c. west jessa...@gmail.com wrote: Anand no longer works for OL/IA but it's true I think it's true that he had the test version. I'm a little new to OS development, what is the difference between getting the code merged and deploying it? While I’m not

Re: [ol-discuss] Ol-discuss Digest, Vol 88, Issue 1

2015-07-02 Thread Anand
On 02-Jul-2015, at 5:53 pm, Karen Coyle kco...@kcoyle.net wrote: On 7/2/15 4:35 AM, Charles Horn wrote: I'm worried now that getting updates released might be a much harder goal that getting code merged if there aren't any IA devs to oversee the release process, or support if something

Re: [ol-discuss] Ol-discuss Digest, Vol 88, Issue 1

2015-07-02 Thread jessamyn c. west
I'll be in touch with some of the IA folks after the holiday weekend in the US and I will raise this question. That list of spammers is HUGELY helpful because at least it's a few clicks to undoing thousands of edits until we can script the process. Jessamyn librarian.net :::

Re: [ol-discuss] Ol-discuss Digest, Vol 88, Issue 1

2015-07-02 Thread Charles Horn
On 30 June 2015 at 04:29, Samuel Klein meta...@gmail.com wrote: On Jun 29, 2015 2:15 PM, Tom Morris tfmor...@gmail.com wrote: There's a bunch of stuff that could be done to streamline the spam flagging and processing, do more automated spam detection, etc. The current web form