Hi.
It's time of the latest lts kernel 3.10.10 into several
-nrj/-nrjQL/-vanilla/-rt/ different flavours!
OpenMandriva Forum: Announce:
http://forum.rosalab.ru/viewtopic.php?f=29t=1223p=19536#p19536
OpenMandriva Forum: Announce:
On Sunday 01 September 2013 20.07:13 Ben Bullard wrote:
Also much confused by massive bad
signatures for our software packages.
There's nothing to worry about.
If it's not given a signature to use, rpm generates a random signature (while
that doesn't say anything about where the package
Am 02.09.2013 14:15, schrieb Bernhard Rosenkränzer:
On Sunday 01 September 2013 20.07:13 Ben Bullard wrote:
Also much confused by massive bad
signatures for our software packages.
There's nothing to worry about.
If it's not given a signature to use, rpm generates a random signature (while
Am 02.09.2013 14:15, schrieb Bernhard Rosenkränzer:
On Sunday 01 September 2013 20.07:13 Ben Bullard wrote:
Also much confused by massive bad
signatures for our software packages.
There's nothing to worry about.
If it's not given a signature to use, rpm generates a random signature
(while
On Sep 2, 2013 7:16 AM, Andrey Bondrov pulfer-coo...@list.ru wrote:
BTW, how to build KDE 4.11.1 if Cooker is frozen? Most likely I'll just
commit everything to git and build for 2012.1 to kde4_backports_personal
(to make sure whole 4.11.1 builds fine). And then you can do KDE mass
rebuild for
On Sep 2, 2013, at 8:15 AM, Bernhard Rosenkränzer wrote:
On Sunday 01 September 2013 20.07:13 Ben Bullard wrote:
Also much confused by massive bad
signatures for our software packages.
There's nothing to worry about.
If it's not given a signature to use, rpm generates a random signature
Whoops - here's the spreadsheet:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AuUzr_Oq1xaydFA3OGlUeUtZMm8zalFvbG90V2RiVEEusp=sharing
On 2 September 2013 14:42, Robert Xu rob...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm doing a runthrough of package signatures with rpm -K and checking
what packages don't have a
Just a small remark - if the packages are ok, they can be resigned easily.
- Исходное сообщение -
От: Robert Xu rob...@gmail.com
Кому: Cooker OpenMandriva om-cooker@ml.openmandriva.org
Отправленные: Понедельник, 2 Сентябрь 2013 г 22:42:32
Тема: Re: [OM Cooker] Heading towards Beta, part
On Sep 2, 2013, at 5:02 AM, Ben Bullard wrote:
Thanks. This is an example of the exact error:
Good: someone has finally changed BAD to INVALID.
Meanwhile the error message is still woefully inadequate
to explain much that is meaningful.
Which is fine *IF AND ONLY IF* the official signing
On Sep 2, 2013, at 2:46 PM, Alexander Burmashev wrote:
Just a small remark - if the packages are ok, they can be resigned easily.
Absolutely. Could have been resigned in the first place even more easily.
A somewhat deeper remark to improve process:
Sign the final distro only, and
On 2 September 2013 14:46, Alexander Burmashev
alex.burmas...@rosalab.ru wrote:
Just a small remark - if the packages are ok, they can be resigned easily.
Then why has this not been done? Has this not been pushed for in the
past few months?
Does ABF not have an option to resign all RPMs in the
On Sep 2, 2013, at 4:11 PM, Robert Xu wrote:
On 2 September 2013 14:46, Alexander Burmashev
alex.burmas...@rosalab.ru wrote:
Just a small remark - if the packages are ok, they can be resigned easily.
Then why has this not been done? Has this not been pushed for in the
past few months?
How about bump gtk3 to 3.8.4? (no major's no breakages)
On Sep 2, 2013, at 4:58 PM, Alexander Burmashev wrote:
But being a little paranoid i also can say that if there are packages without
a proper signature in the repo it MAY mean that something went wrong and MAY
indicate a possible secuity breach. So you should not just hit resign button
14 matches
Mail list logo
