Re: [OM Cooker] Gimp requires kernel-headers and gcc

2016-04-09 Thread Matthew Portner
Gimo shouldn't require kernel headers. It's likely a dependency issue with a new package related to it if not it. Sent from my iPhone > On Apr 9, 2016, at 11:46 AM, rugyada wrote: > > Guys, I cannot know if this is a bug or expected behaviour. > Please tell me if I shall

Re: [OM Cooker] Gimp requires kernel-headers and gcc

2016-04-09 Thread rugyada
Guys, I cannot know if this is a bug or expected behaviour. Please tell me if I shall file a bugreport or not, thanks. 2016-04-09 8:19 GMT+02:00 rugyada : > Hello, > > Is it correct that urpmi gimp requires kernel-headers and some > development packages? > > > > -- >

Re: [OM Cooker] Gimp requires kernel-headers and gcc

2016-04-09 Thread rugyada
Hi Chris, maybe somebody has read and ***silently*** fixed the issue :) Ok, better. 2016-04-09 20:02 GMT+02:00 Chris Tanner : > Hi Rugyada, > > The latest update updated gegl which I think fixes your problem. > > Regards, > > Chris > > > On 09/04/16 01:53 PM,

Re: [OM Cooker] Gimp requires kernel-headers and gcc

2016-04-09 Thread Chris Tanner
Hi Rugyada, The latest update updated gegl which I think fixes your problem. Regards, Chris On 09/04/16 01:53 PM, rugyada wrote: Thank you Chris. Will do soon. 2016-04-09 19:28 GMT+02:00 Chris Tanner : I did a couple of tests, and this appears to be true.

Re: [OM Cooker] Gimp requires kernel-headers and gcc

2016-04-09 Thread rugyada
Thank you Chris. Will do soon. 2016-04-09 19:28 GMT+02:00 Chris Tanner : > I did a couple of tests, and this appears to be true. I do not understand > the dependencies, but I do not think that this is the expected behaviour. > > I think that a bug report is a

Re: [OM Cooker] Gimp requires kernel-headers and gcc

2016-04-09 Thread Chris Tanner
I did a couple of tests, and this appears to be true. I do not understand the dependencies, but I do not think that this is the expected behaviour. I think that a bug report is a good idea. Regards, Chris On 09/04/16 12:46 PM, rugyada wrote: Guys, I cannot know if this is a bug or expected