Re: [OmniOS-discuss] User/group with CIFS

2015-08-02 Thread Stephan Budach
If you want to, you can go with Samba and vfs:fruit. vfs:fruit has been developed by one of the main Netatalk developers and successfully overcomes a) the permissions issue b) the locking issue between Samba and Netatalk I actually haven't had the time to test that out, but I will do that in t

Re: [OmniOS-discuss] supermicro A1SRM-2558F

2015-08-02 Thread Michael Rasmussen
On Sun, 02 Aug 2015 20:23:46 +0200 Jim Klimov wrote: > > FWIW, Oracle boasted that Fishworks storage had a lot of cores that were > quite used in compression, perhaps dedup and encryption (not illumos case), > btw you can plug VFS filters like antivirus into zfs since almost forever, > etc. A

Re: [OmniOS-discuss] supermicro A1SRM-2558F

2015-08-02 Thread Jim Klimov
2 августа 2015 г. 15:46:54 CEST, Michael Rasmussen пишет: >On Sun, 02 Aug 2015 13:32:39 +0200 >Jim Klimov wrote: > >> >> Umm, roughly twice as many independent tasks, assuming you can >saturate your 4 cores? Think compile farms, mail relays with antispam, >webservers, databases with parallelisab

Re: [OmniOS-discuss] User/group with CIFS

2015-08-02 Thread Guenther Alka
Netatalk and Solaris CIFS are incompatible regarding permissions in an AD environment or regarding groups. One problem hides in the + of -rwx--+ 1 olaf olaf 469 Aug 2 17:12 scaletta2.txt This means that there are ACLs defined. While netatalk uses classic Unix permissions (owne

[OmniOS-discuss] User/group with CIFS

2015-08-02 Thread Olaf Marzocchi
Hello, in my server (latest stable release) I use netatalk to share files with OS X and I use CIFS (kernel) for Windows. I never noticed until now that the files made by the two operating systems have mismatching and incompatible permissions. This prevents me from modifying or deleting under an

Re: [OmniOS-discuss] supermicro A1SRM-2558F

2015-08-02 Thread Michael Rasmussen
On Sun, 02 Aug 2015 13:32:39 +0200 Jim Klimov wrote: > > Umm, roughly twice as many independent tasks, assuming you can saturate your > 4 cores? Think compile farms, mail relays with antispam, webservers, > databases with parallelisable queries, zfs with compression, VMs, etc. Simply > many b

Re: [OmniOS-discuss] supermicro A1SRM-2558F

2015-08-02 Thread Jim Klimov
1 августа 2015 г. 22:16:16 CEST, Michael Rasmussen пишет: >On Sat, 01 Aug 2015 15:54:59 -0400 >"Ottmar Klaas" wrote: > >> I have been running OmniOS on the A1SRM-2758F-O since February. No >complaints, runs nicely. >> >But is 90€ more worth the money for extra 4 cores? > >I wonder how much more