Re: [OMPI packagers] Open MPI packagers email list

2018-07-11 Thread Alastair McKinstry 

I'm seeing errors of the form:

===
build: OK
[runner-103358cc-project-28133-concurrent-0:04241] PMIX-XFER-VALUE: UNSUPPORTED 
TYPE 28016
[runner-103358cc-project-28133-concurrent-0:04241] PMIX ERROR: ERROR in file 
../../../src/server/pmix_server.c at line 332
ERROR: Job failed: exit code 1
===

that i'm trying to debug (OMPI 3.1.1, PMIX 3.0.0)

regards
Alastair


On 11/07/2018 17:04, Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) wrote:

Ralph: do you mean to say "Open MPI v4.0.x will be compatible with any PMIx >= 
v3.0.0"?



On Jul 11, 2018, at 12:02 PM, r...@open-mpi.org wrote:

Yes - with any OMPI of v3.x and above


On Jul 11, 2018, at 3:41 AM, Alastair McKinstry  
wrote:

Hi Jeff

Whats the relationship between OpenMPI and the PMIX 3.0.0 release  ?

Are they compatible ?

regards

Alastair



On 10/07/2018 23:19, Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) wrote:

Yo Alastair --

Would you mind joining the Open MPI packagers email list?  It's very low volume:

 https://lists.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo/ompi-packagers

As part of our attempt to provide better communications to our downstream 
packagers, we just sent out a note about the upcoming v4.0.0:

 
https://www.mail-archive.com/ompi-packagers@lists.open-mpi.org/msg2.html

And there was one previous to this, too:

 
https://www.mail-archive.com/ompi-packagers@lists.open-mpi.org/msg00001.html


--
Alastair McKinstry, , , 
https://diaspora.sceal.ie/u/amckinstry
Commander Vimes didn’t like the phrase “The innocent have nothing to fear,”
believing the innocent had everything to fear, mostly from the guilty but in 
the longer term
even more from those who say things like “The innocent have nothing to fear.”
- T. Pratchett, Snuff

___
ompi-packagers mailing list
ompi-packagers@lists.open-mpi.org
https://rfd.newmexicoconsortium.org/mailman/listinfo/ompi-packagers




--
Alastair McKinstry, , , 
https://diaspora.sceal.ie/u/amckinstry
Commander Vimes didn’t like the phrase “The innocent have nothing to fear,”
 believing the innocent had everything to fear, mostly from the guilty but in 
the longer term
 even more from those who say things like “The innocent have nothing to fear.”
 - T. Pratchett, Snuff

___
ompi-packagers mailing list
ompi-packagers@lists.open-mpi.org
https://rfd.newmexicoconsortium.org/mailman/listinfo/ompi-packagers

Re: [OMPI packagers] Open MPI packagers email list

2018-07-11 Thread Alastair McKinstry 

Hi Jeff

Whats the relationship between OpenMPI and the PMIX 3.0.0 release  ?

Are they compatible ?

regards

Alastair



On 10/07/2018 23:19, Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) wrote:

Yo Alastair --

Would you mind joining the Open MPI packagers email list?  It's very low volume:

 https://lists.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo/ompi-packagers

As part of our attempt to provide better communications to our downstream 
packagers, we just sent out a note about the upcoming v4.0.0:

 
https://www.mail-archive.com/ompi-packagers@lists.open-mpi.org/msg2.html

And there was one previous to this, too:

 
https://www.mail-archive.com/ompi-packagers@lists.open-mpi.org/msg1.html



--
Alastair McKinstry, , , 
https://diaspora.sceal.ie/u/amckinstry
Commander Vimes didn’t like the phrase “The innocent have nothing to fear,”
 believing the innocent had everything to fear, mostly from the guilty but in 
the longer term
 even more from those who say things like “The innocent have nothing to fear.”
 - T. Pratchett, Snuff

___
ompi-packagers mailing list
ompi-packagers@lists.open-mpi.org
https://rfd.newmexicoconsortium.org/mailman/listinfo/ompi-packagers

[OMPI packagers] Shift focus to external libevent, hwloc, pmix

2018-07-11 Thread Alastair McKinstry 

Hi,

For the v4.0 release, is it expected that the major library version will 
change again ?


i.e. from so.40 currently on most libraries to so.50 ?

If so, this will involve another transition on Debian/Ubuntu.

Also, I'd like to revisit the Symbol versioning feature 
(https://github.com/open-mpi/ompi/issues/1956).


This was closed due to lack of followup on my part at the time (sorry 
about that). AFAIK the problem is making my gcc patch work on other 
compilers; is this the case, and if it was reopened what compilers 
should be targetted ?



regards
Alastair

--
Alastair McKinstry, , , 
https://diaspora.sceal.ie/u/amckinstry
Misentropy: doubting that the Universe is becoming more disordered.

___
ompi-packagers mailing list
ompi-packagers@lists.open-mpi.org
https://rfd.newmexicoconsortium.org/mailman/listinfo/ompi-packagers