Hi Orion
We prefer to build against the external package as opposed to the bundled ones
and have biased our configure logic in that direction (use external if found).
Our concern with PRRTE is that we were asking you folks to build/distribute
another package, and we respect and appreciate that
From a Fedora perspective -
We prefer separate packages, but it is acceptable to bundle
libraries if required - especially if OMPI is only tested against a few
(or a single) version of PRRTE. However, I would say that if Fedora
ends up packaging PRRTE separately we would really rather
Just as an FYI - just learned that a major resource manager vendor will be
utilizing PRRTE as their runtime for executing applications. So a significant
percentage of HPC systems are going to need a PRRTE package, hopefully
distributed by someone from the distro community.
Ralph
> On Apr 27,
Open MPI packagers --
Just to be clear: this is an open question to you for the upcoming Open MPI
v5.0.x series.
We'd really appreciate your feedback.
Thanks!
> On Apr 14, 2020, at 12:40 PM, Ralph Castain wrote:
>
> Just pinging you all to ensure you got this. I need to know if we need
Just pinging you all to ensure you got this. I need to know if we need
to coordinate an official PRRTE release to coincide (and sync) with the release
of OMPI v5.0, or if you are okay with just using the embedded PRRTE included
with the OMPI v5.0 tarball.
If it helps, PRRTE depends upon
