Re: [onap-discuss] vCPE closed loop testing session

2017-10-06 Thread Kang Xi
Hi Eric, Thanks for the info. I'll give it a try. Regards, Kang From: Multanen, Eric W [mailto:eric.w.multa...@intel.com] Sent: Friday, October 06, 2017 15:00 To: Kang Xi ; Yoav Kluger ; onap-discuss Cc: Ukponmwan,

[onap-discuss] [integration][policy][aai][multivim][dcae][appc] vCPE integration test session

2017-10-06 Thread Kang Xi
BEGIN:VCALENDAR METHOD:REQUEST PRODID:Microsoft Exchange Server 2010 VERSION:2.0 BEGIN:VTIMEZONE TZID:Eastern Standard Time BEGIN:STANDARD DTSTART:16010101T02 TZOFFSETFROM:-0400 TZOFFSETTO:-0500 RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;INTERVAL=1;BYDAY=1SU;BYMONTH=11 END:STANDARD BEGIN:DAYLIGHT

Re: [onap-discuss] vCPE closed loop testing session

2017-10-06 Thread Multanen, Eric W
Kang, On your vG-MUX instance, you should be able to do the following: 1. Bring down the network interfaces that need to be under vpp control (e.g. the interfaces with 10.5.0.120 and 10.1.0.120 on the vG-MUX) a. sudo ifconfig ethX down 2. Restart vpp - vpp should take control

Re: [onap-discuss] ECOMPPORTAL servlet exception with 500 HTTP Status

2017-10-06 Thread Ganesh Kaila
Hi Manoop, Did you get a chance to check SDC docker images? Thanks, Ganesh On Fri, Oct 6, 2017 at 8:22 PM, TALASILA, MANOOP (MANOOP) < talas...@research.att.com> wrote: > Hi Ganesh, > > > > I would check VID and SDC docker images, if they have any latest updates > to their images. > > > >

[onap-discuss] [AAI] Not able to get relationship between two service-instances in AAI

2017-10-06 Thread Prashant Kumar
Hi Jimmy, I am trying to create two service-instances in AAI and adding relationship between two. But when I am getting these services, response does not have relationship. Even when I am trying to get relationship-list then also I am not getting any relationship. Do you have any idea about

Re: [onap-discuss] ECOMPPORTAL servlet exception with 500 HTTP Status

2017-10-06 Thread TALASILA, MANOOP (MANOOP)
Hi Ganesh, I would check VID and SDC docker images, if they have any latest updates to their images. Portal just refers to these application’s landing page URLs, so if their Docker images are stable and latest, everything should work. Manoop From: Ganesh Kaila Date:

Re: [onap-discuss] ECOMPPORTAL servlet exception with 500 HTTP Status

2017-10-06 Thread Ganesh Kaila
Hi Subhash, In my case, VID seems to be fine. I am not able to see SDC. Hi Manoop, I am running the ONAP setup on Vanilla openstack where both sdc and portal vms are running. If you suggest any debugging or workaround, then I will hold this setup for today. Otherwise, I want to redeploy the

[onap-discuss] [sdc][dmaap]Could not find DMaaP topic when distributing SDC model

2017-10-06 Thread Yang Xu (Yang, Fixed Network)
Hi Ram and DMaaP team, Integration testing is blocked by some SDC distribution failure. We saw DMAAP error message and created JIRA https://jira.onap.org/browse/DMAAP-157. We are on zoom https://zoom.us/j/44 now, please join us to help debug the issue.

Re: [onap-discuss] ECOMPPORTAL servlet exception with 500 HTTP Status

2017-10-06 Thread TALASILA, MANOOP (MANOOP)
To access applications like SDC from Portal, you would need to install SDC in your environment. Manoop On Fri, Oct 6, 2017 at 3:02 AM -0400, "Ganesh Kaila" > wrote: Hello Manoop, Recently, I did the deployment of portal successfully with

Re: [onap-discuss] ECOMPPORTAL servlet exception with 500 HTTP Status

2017-10-06 Thread Subhash Kumar Singh
Hello Ganesh, Yesterday we tried to bring up the ONAP setup, SDC is accessible but not the VID. Please check if all the dockers are up for SDC and also check the robot health check status for all the service. -- Regards, Subhash Kumar Singh

Re: [onap-discuss] ECOMPPORTAL servlet exception with 500 HTTP Status

2017-10-06 Thread Ganesh Kaila
Hello Manoop, Recently, I did the deployment of portal successfully with 1.3-STAGING-latest. But, SDC portal is showing HTTP 404 error. Can others see the same? Thanks, Ganesh On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 7:10 PM, TALASILA, MANOOP (MANOOP) < talas...@research.att.com> wrote: > Hi Marc, > > We tried