Happy to. Although please realize that there is NO instance of a composite
pattern in "ONAP Service 2017-11-08" The same is true for "ONAP Resource
2017-11-08". Hence, I would like to know what diagram you are looking at...
...In fact, there are a LOT of recursive relationships, and in general,
I am not sure we are looking at the same picture.
Let us have more discussion offline.
Thanks,
Lingli
From: John Strassner [mailto:straz...@gmail.com]
Sent: 2017年11月23日 9:43
To: 邓灵莉 ; John Strassner
Cc: MAYER, ANDREW J ;
Sorry, forgot one other thing. Looking at the Service diagram (11-08
version), you are NOT using the composite pattern. What you have is a
recursive aggregation, which is NOT the same thing, and is prone to causing
modeling problems if you have subclasses of ServiceComponentDesc.
If you need help
There are a number of reasons, but the most important are:
1) The Decorator enables attributes and/or methods to be used to
construct a new object dynamically at runtime; the composite is fixed at
design time
2) The Decorator enables one to use all or part of an object to build a
new
I believe we are using the composite pattern currently.
Why the decorator pattern would be better?
Lingli
发自网易邮箱大师
On 11/23/2017 05:03, John Strassner wrote: While I agree with the requirements that Andy said (e.g., a ServiceComponent should support multiple Services, and a ServiceComponent
Verified working for https as well - I cloned just now
Also the CD server runs on master every hour - it clones using anonymous http
via git clone http://gerrit.onap.org/r/oom
You can verify master branch (soon to be R1 branch) OOM status here until the
job is migrated to Jenkins.onap.org
While I agree with the requirements that Andy said (e.g., a
ServiceComponent should support multiple Services, and a ServiceComponent
should exist independent of a Service),
1) this is assuming that a ServiceComponent is as defined in the MEF
2) I don't think the existing model works - you
Hello Muhammad,
Please use the latest templates in Gerrit (yaml and env files):
https://gerrit.onap.org/r/gitweb?p=demo.git;a=tree;f=heat/ONAP;h=77a6ce1f507981e0c4f0515a5fcc5fbd6db84660;hb=refs/heads/master
The template you are using is pretty old.
Thanks,
Marco
From:
This works for me (please note "https"):
git clone https://gerrit.onap.org/r/oom
> On Nov 22, 2017, at 5:32 AM, Kiruthiga R wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> As part of ONAP on Kubernetes installation, while trying to clone the oom
> repo using anonymous http method (git
Hi,
I've started deploying ONAP using the following Heat template.
https://nexus.onap.org/content/sites/raw/org.openecomp.demo/heat/OpenECOMP/1.1.0-SNAPSHOT/onap_openstack.yaml
Stack creation was successful in Openstack. VMs and networks are up running.
However, Portal VM was not configured
Hi All,
As part of ONAP on Kubernetes installation, while trying to clone the oom repo
using anonymous http method (git clone http://gerrit.onap.org/r/oom) we get
page not found error.
Before Amsterdam release, git clone to oom repo was happening fine without any
issues. Please help.
Thanks
Seshu is on a business trip and will not be available for this meeting.
I propose that we meet 1 hour later than this scheduled time (i.e. at the old
time: 9:30 US ET). Since Seshu is the organizer, I don't think I can change
the calendar appointment. The main thing I want to discuss is
Hi,
I believe this is beneficial for all of us. But before decide anything
something, it would be good to have a quick discussion about it within OPNFV
community.
I added this as a topic to the Infra WG Meeting agenda on November 27th.
https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/INF/Infra+Working+Group
Good day, definitely missing the Portal-apps VM! Please choose a Heat template
that deploys the just-released Amsterdam release of Portal, which is version
1.3.0, instead of the (much older) 1.1.0. Hope this helps.
> On Nov 22, 2017, at 8:52 AM, Muhammad Ali wrote:
>
Hi,
I've started deploying ONAP using the following Heat template.
https://nexus.onap.org/content/sites/raw/org.openecomp.demo/heat/OpenECOMP/1.1.0-SNAPSHOT/onap_openstack.yaml
Stack creation was successful in Openstack. VMs and networks are up running.
However, Portal VM was not configured
Hi Moshe, Thanks for looking into this problem.
Hi Edan, I pulled the master branch of devkit, yes I have "roles" dir
. Unfortunately,
It did not work. I got struck at the same step.
Please refer the attached images. Thank you!
Regards,
Karthik
On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 2:36 PM, Karthik
Hi Viswa, Thanks for your email.
Hi Edan, Thanks a lot for your quick response. As Viswa told, We are from
Verizon and exploring VVP .
Please find my response below:
1. Can you check there isn’t a problematic network adapter in virtualbox
?
* I checked the virtualbox, there is no
17 matches
Mail list logo