[onap-discuss] [integration][oom] [portal] [so] Integration Working Session

BEGIN:VCALENDAR METHOD:REQUEST PRODID:Microsoft Exchange Server 2010 VERSION:2.0 BEGIN:VTIMEZONE TZID:Pacific Standard Time BEGIN:STANDARD DTSTART:16010101T02 TZOFFSETFROM:-0700 TZOFFSETTO:-0800 RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;INTERVAL=1;BYDAY=1SU;BYMONTH=11 END:STANDARD BEGIN:DAYLIGHT

[onap-discuss] Queries regarding dcae_cli tool

Hi, Kindly clarify following queries for dcae_cli tool a) Is dcae_cli postgress database for catalog a separate database, can we use existing database from other ONAP components (i.e. SDC)? b) Can dcae_cli tool generate csar without setting-up catalog database? c) Is there

Re: [onap-discuss] OOM deployment error - use HELM 2.8.2 up from 2.7.2 after OOM-779

Just to update; upgrading helm indeed did fix the issue. Below are the steps incase someone else stumbles on similar issue. wget

Re: [onap-discuss] [Onap-usecasesub] Usecase subcommittee meeting of 30/4/2018 - the summary

Hi, Currently we have the SDN-C and APP-C and VFC in the architecture. There has been proposals in the directional architecture to bring this down to SDN-C and A Generic NF controller. In this proposal it was focussed on increasing the alignment and replacing controllers, not putting an

[onap-discuss] [integration][vid][aai] Distribution status attribute in AAI for models

Hi, Looking at the latest (todays) images for VID and AAI I think I see a mismatch. VID is doing a query into AAI looking for {"start" : "service-design-and-creation/models/","query" : "query/serviceModels-byDistributionStatus?distributionStatus=DISTRIBUTION_COMPLETE_OK"} But in the

Re: [onap-discuss] Is Nexus2 legacy?

On 05/03/2018 01:52 AM, Jaroslav Safka wrote: > Hi all, > > I have a question regarding nexus 2 and nexus 3. Is the nexus 2 still > required, when we have the nexus 3? > > Are there any missing features in nexus 3? > > Thanks and have a nice day :) Greetings Jaroslav, Nexus 2 is still

Re: [onap-discuss] OOM deployment error - use HELM 2.8.2 up from 2.7.2 after OOM-779

Hi Michael (and Josef) Thank you for the update! I will try switching to newer helm and check. The other warning reported was indeed noticed before (that dint really interfere with the deployment). Regards -Vijay From: OBRIEN, FRANK MICHAEL Sent: Thursday, May 03, 2018 10:52 AM To: VENKATESH

Re: [onap-discuss] OOM deployment error - use HELM 2.8.2 up from 2.7.2 after OOM-779

Vijaj, Hi, I was worried about this. There was a change put in for APPC where a helm upgrade to 2.8.2 was required. We already were prototyping the 2.7.2 to 2.8.2 was beneficial for onap upgrades being run by Mike E. but those were in progress and did not require 2.8.2 yet. Because of

Re: [onap-discuss] Regarding DCAE on OOM

Mandeep, Hi, forwarding to community. Welcome - Accenture is an excellent and very efficient organization from my experience. From the pod names and namespace below - it looks like a pre-amsterdam deployment - before last Sept 2017 - you do not want to be running that old release.

Re: [onap-discuss] SDC deployment on heat and OOM

Michael, The issue with the Heat deployment is that connection to Gerrit timed out, so the SDC repo hasn’t been cloned: fatal: unable to access 'http://gerrit.onap.org/r/sdc.git/': Failed to connect to gerrit.onap.org port 80: Connection timed out As a consequence, sdc_vm_init.sh couldn’t

Re: [onap-discuss] [Onap-usecasesub] Usecase subcommittee meeting of 30/4/2018 - the summary

Andrej, I suppose there are a variety of ways this could be implemented, as all three derive from CC-SDK. SDN-R = CC-SDK + Mobility Wireless "artifacts" Tracy From: Andrej Záň Sent: Thursday, May 03, 2018 9:21 AM To: VAN BRAKLE, TRACY L ; Vladimir

Re: [onap-discuss] [Onap-usecasesub] Usecase subcommittee meeting of 30/4/2018 - the summary

Hello there, I have one question (possibly stupid one, sorry for that). You wrote that SDN-R will be SDN-C + APP-C functionality but for Mobility Wireless. Does that mean, that these functions can't be provided by some combination/cooperation of SDN-C and APP-C themselves? Regards Andrej

Re: [onap-discuss] [Onap-usecasesub] Usecase subcommittee meeting of 30/4/2018 - the summary

Vladimir, As of now, the expectation is that all categories of parameters would be supported by the ONAP controller derived from CC-SDK for Mobility Wireless. We have dubbed this controller "SDN-R," as you know, because this particular label has meaning (traction, actually) within both ONAP

[onap-discuss] OOM deployment error

OOM Team, While deploying the latest (master) OOM charts, running into below error. ubuntu@vv-k8-2:~/oom/kubernetes$ helm install local/onap -n dev --namespace onap 2018/05/03 02:36:05 warning: skipped value for image: Not a table. Error: error validating "": error validating data: found

[onap-discuss] AAI R2 Vulnerability report

Hi, Stephen, The AAI team has made great strides in reducing the number of vulnerabilities across our many repositories. I have updated the AAI Vulnerability report here: https://wiki.onap.org/x/ZzSEAQ The last item shows champ as “in progress” with a link to 2 jira stories – the team is

[onap-discuss] SDC deployment on heat and OOM

Hi, After Gary explained to me how I can login into the external labs I started checking our deployment there. Heat: It looks like on the last heat deployment execution https://jenkins.onap.org/view/External%20Labs/job/lab-windriver-beijing-heat-deploy/259/consoleFull The SDC was not even

Re: [onap-discuss] Weekly Service IM Discussion Call

Thank you Pascal for the introduction. Nice to meet you Bithika, and welcome on board. Lingli From: Pascal Menezes Sent: 2018年5月2日 19:31 To: Lingli Deng ; 'BEGWANI, VIMAL' ; 'BULLARD, GIL' ; Chris Purdy

Re: [onap-discuss] [Onap-usecasesub] Usecase subcommittee meeting of 30/4/2018 - the summary

Tracy, Steve and Vimal I have to admit that I am confused as well and need your help. Which categories of parameters will be supported by the SDN-R? Which categories of "the parameters needed for DU & CUs" cannot be supported by the SDN-R (why?) and will be supported by the APP-C? Thanks Vladimir

[onap-discuss] Community feedback

Hi, Following discussions we had at ONS, and during one of the TSC meetings and also during the dedicated meeting we set, the following list of issues was consolidated: https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Community+Feedback All - please check if there are additional concerns/proposals you would