Re: [onap-discuss] VES RanMetrics Recommendation

2018-06-20 Thread Michela Bevilacqua
B2 3D30 ag1...@att.com<mailto:ag1...@att.com> From: Michela Bevilacqua mailto:michela.bevilac...@ericsson.com>> Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2018 12:16 AM To: GUPTA, ALOK mailto:ag1...@att.com>>; kp...@linuxfoundation.org<mailto:kp...@linuxfoundation.org>; JI, LUSHENG mail

Re: [onap-discuss] VES RanMetrics Recommendation

2018-06-18 Thread Michela Bevilacqua
HI Alok, I´ve noticed fault sheet is not updated according to the agreement reached last week during the DCAE meeting. (i.e. MO and MO instance, 3GPP alarm id). Are you going to send for review a final update version with VES 6.0 specs ? BR Michela From: onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org On

Re: [onap-discuss] [sdc] Mom of the meeting

2018-05-24 Thread Michela Bevilacqua
HI, Where can I find the Minutes of the meeting and possible the recording about R3 content discussions ? Thanks Michela ___ onap-discuss mailing list onap-discuss@lists.onap.org https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss

Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] Resource TOSCA Data model

2018-03-06 Thread Michela Bevilacqua
Hi, I share some questions about Resource TOSCA data model as follow up of the today´s ONAP modeling subcommittee meeting 1. Assuming the discussion we had today during the ONAP modeling subcommittee about OASIS TOSCA NFV or SOL001 is limited to the VNF onboarding model. What is the TOSCA

Re: [onap-discuss] [onap-tsc] [modeling] Beijing Release new functional requirements

2018-02-21 Thread Michela Bevilacqua
21 februari 2018 08:50 To: Michela Bevilacqua ; denghui (L) ; onap-discuss@lists.onap.org Subject: RE: [onap-tsc] [modeling] Beijing Release new functional requirements Hi Michela, Regarding HPA in particular This is a functional requirement at cuts across multiple use cases in support

Re: [onap-discuss] [onap-tsc] [modeling] Beijing Release new functional requirements

2018-02-20 Thread Michela Bevilacqua
Hi, In the context of Beijing release, it could be good to have some more inputs about possible ONAP IM and ONAP TOSCA DM impacts/expectations in relation to the new functional requirements: 1. HPA: discussions progressed, analysis is ongoing 2. Change Management: no input 3. Scaling: n

Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] Whether How and when we should move to Github for modeling spec update process

2018-02-02 Thread Michela Bevilacqua
+1, favorable to a Git for ONAP IM in Papyrus. ONAP modeling subcommittee can be responsible for this with committers based on commit operation in papyrus. Use GenDoc to document the model. Approach it in Beijing release, learn from the experience and be more effective in Casablanca release.