SDN-R is ONF project based on the Microwave Information Model TR-532, which is
quite distant from what is needed for cellular RAN.
So what we knew as SDN-R in fact never was SDN Radio controller :)
Therefore we are free to keep the name SDN-R or find another good looking name.
After all, it's
SON support
2. Network slicing support
3. Controllers architecture
I attach them to this email.
Best regards,
Alla Goldner
Open Network Division
Amdocs Technology
[cid:image001.png@01D3EAB4.83F83110]
From: Vladimir Yanover (vyanover) [mailto:vyano...@cisco.com]
Sent: Saturday, Ma
definition yet (in
3GPP) of slice level performance measurements. With no performance
measurements, what kind of optimization can be arranged?
Thanks
Vladimir
From: Alla Goldner <alla.gold...@amdocs.com>
Sent: Friday, May 11, 2018 11:34 AM
To: Vladimir Yanover (vyanover) <vyano...@cisco.co
Alla,
Can you please clarify what exactly you received from 5G group?
Unless I am missing something, there was no 5G call to finally decide which use
cases are going to the use case subcommittee. There were several proposals
presented, most of them good, but even for those I have difficulty to
lt;andrej@pantheon.tech>; Vladimir Yanover (vyanover)
<vyano...@cisco.com>; BEGWANI, VIMAL <vb1...@att.com>; Stephen Terrill
<stephen.terr...@ericsson.com>; Alla Goldner <alla.gold...@amdocs.com>;
onap-usecase...@lists.onap.org
Cc: onap-...@lists.onap.org
Tracy, Steve and Vimal
I have to admit that I am confused as well and need your help.
Which categories of parameters will be supported by the SDN-R?
Which categories of "the parameters needed for DU & CUs" cannot be supported by
the SDN-R (why?) and will be supported by the APP-C?
Thanks
Vladimir
And where this intention / timeline is captured?
Thanks
Vladimir
From: jamil.cha...@orange.com [mailto:jamil.cha...@orange.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 14, 2017 4:29 PM
To: Vladimir Yanover (vyanover) <vyano...@cisco.com>
Subject: RE: [onap-tsc] Official ONAP Architecture Slide
It should b
How is it related to my question on the timeline for delivery of specification
with certain level of details?
Thanks
Vladimir
From: jamil.cha...@orange.com [mailto:jamil.cha...@orange.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 14, 2017 4:16 PM
To: Vladimir Yanover (vyanover) <vyano...@cisco.com>
Cc:
To: Vladimir Yanover (vyanover) <vyano...@cisco.com>
Cc: Kenny Paul <kp...@linuxfoundation.org>; onap-discuss
<onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>; onap-tsc <onap-...@lists.onap.org>; Lisa Caywood
<lcayw...@linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [onap-tsc] Official ONAP Architecture
Hello, Kenny
Thanks for sharing the Architecture diagram.
I will appreciate if you help me with a question that I have on the ONAP
architecture documentation.
Consider potential products to be integrated into the ONAP system itself,
interfacing to its components such as the Policy Framework and
Hi, Alla
Let me ask for clarification. The link in the presentation "ONAP R2 use cases
discussion r1"
https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Release+2+Use+Cases
points to the page (A) with a list of use cases proposed by Dhananjay Pavgi.
There is no indication of existence of other use cases.
There
Kenny,
Being comparatively new to the organization, I am trying to understand the
procedure. Let me ask this.
> the intended scope of those provisions extends beyond the specific changes to
> the topic of Steering Committee elections
It sounds like there are restrictions to which part of the TSC
12 matches
Mail list logo
