; onap-discuss@lists.onap.org;
onap-...@lists.onap.org
Subject: RE: [Onap-usecasesub] [onap-discuss] Usecase subcommittee meeting of
30/4/2018 - the summary
Andrej,
I suppose there are a variety of ways this could be implemented, as all three
derive from CC-SDK.
SDN-R = CC-SDK + Mobility Wireless "ar
l
<stephen.terr...@ericsson.com>; Alla Goldner <alla.gold...@amdocs.com>;
onap-usecase...@lists.onap.org
Cc: onap-...@lists.onap.org; onap-discuss@lists.onap.org;
onap-...@lists.onap.org
Subject: RE: [onap-discuss] [Onap-usecasesub] Usecase subcommittee meeting of
30/4/2018 - the summar
g;
onap-...@lists.onap.org
Subject: Re: [Onap-usecasesub] [onap-discuss] Usecase subcommittee meeting of
30/4/2018 - the summary
Hello there,
I have one question (possibly stupid one, sorry for that).
You wrote that SDN-R will be SDN-C + APP-C functionality but for Mobility
Wireless. Does tha
onap-...@lists.onap.org
Predmet: Re: [Onap-usecasesub] [onap-discuss] Usecase subcommittee meeting of
30/4/2018 - the summary
Vladimir,
As of now, the expectation is that all categories of parameters would be
supported by the ONAP controller derived from CC-SDK for Mobility Wireless.
W
m>; onap-usecase...@lists.onap.org
Cc: onap-...@lists.onap.org; onap-discuss@lists.onap.org;
onap-...@lists.onap.org
Subject: RE: [Onap-usecasesub] [onap-discuss] Usecase subcommittee meeting of
30/4/2018 - the summary
Tracy, Steve and Vimal
I have to admit that I am confused as well and need y
.gold...@amdocs.com>;
onap-usecase...@lists.onap.org
Cc: onap-...@lists.onap.org; onap-discuss@lists.onap.org;
onap-...@lists.onap.org
Subject: Re: [Onap-usecasesub] [onap-discuss] Usecase subcommittee meeting of
30/4/2018 - the summary
Whatever we elect to call it, "SDN-R" in Casabl
lla Goldner
<alla.gold...@amdocs.com>; onap-usecase...@lists.onap.org
Cc: onap-...@lists.onap.org; onap-discuss@lists.onap.org;
onap-...@lists.onap.org
Subject: Re: [onap-discuss] [Onap-usecasesub] Usecase subcommittee meeting of
30/4/2018 - the summary
***Security Advisory: This Message Originated Ou
Hi Vimal,
Thanks for the reply. Can you please elaborate on the motivation that 1. It
has to be one controller and 2. Why the SDN-C and APP-C is insufficient.
While I appreciate the value of creating controller persona's from CCSDK, I see
a headacke in bringing these persona variants into the
Steve,
We have a SDN-C sub-project called SND-R, that focuses on radio configuration
using NetConf Yang, but it did not cover all the parameters needed for DU & CUs
(and UPF) and need support Ansible. We also realized that all mobility network
elements should be managed by the same
