+ @seshu.kuma...@huawei.com

br,
Krzysztof

________________________________
Od: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org <onap-discuss@lists.onap.org> w imieniu 
użytkownika Krzysztof Kuźmicki <krzysztof.kuzmi...@nokia.com>
Wysłane: wtorek, 23 października 2018 14:38
Do: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org; Muszkieta, Lukasz (Nokia - PL/Wroclaw)
DW: subhash.kumar.si...@huawei.com; os0...@intl.att.com; FREEMAN, BRIAN D; 
helen.c...@huawei.com; Przybysz, Marcin (Nokia - PL/Wroclaw); Kukulski, Marek 
(Nokia - PL/Wroclaw); Pondel, Marek (Nokia - PL/Wroclaw)
Temat: Suspected SPAM - [onap-discuss] [Integration][SO][VID] problem with 
instantiation vCPE service -> PnP PNF


Hi


During integration tests for PnP PNF we noticed interface inconstancy between 
VID and SO

For PnP PNF work-flow we are using modified fork of  
/mso/async/services/CreateGenericALaCarteServiceInstance  bpmn work-flow -->> 
/mso/async/services/CreateVcpeResCustService_simplified

For this issue has been reported bug: https://jira.onap.org/browse/SO-1156

In short words.
In case of any vCPE service instantiation in SO, in bpmn flow in 
CreateVcpeResCustService - preProcessRequest is present check if VID has sent, 
in parameter lcpCloudRegionId both cloudOwner and cloudRegionId separated using 
"_" .
Unfortuantelly VID sends only cloudRegionId.
As @Muszkieta, Lukasz (Nokia - PL/Wroclaw)<mailto:lukasz.muszki...@nokia.com> 
checked for other services such check doesn't exists.
Did you tried during integration test activities instantiate any vCPE service 
and noticed such problem?

br,
Krzysztof


-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#13226): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/13226
Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/27568157/21656
Group Owner: onap-discuss+ow...@lists.onap.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Reply via email to