ot;
, "onap-discuss@lists.onap.org"
Subject: Re: [onap-discuss] OOM Beijing CPU utilization
“Wondering if Kubernetes or Docker have a solution for this.” - Yes. During
the Casablanca release the OOM team (with the help of the entire ONAP
community) will add resource limits to the Helm charts
ot; ,
"onap-discuss@lists.onap.org"
Subject: Re: [onap-discuss] OOM Beijing CPU utilization
This is a major drawback of Containerization versus Virtualization.
How a process could hog platform resources and affect everything else.
Wondering if Kubernetes or Docker have a solution for this.
] On Behalf Of GUAN, HONG
Sent: Friday, May 18, 2018 9:16 AM
To: Michael O'Brien <frank.obr...@amdocs.com>; abdelmuhaimen.sea...@orange.com;
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
Subject: Re: [onap-discuss] OOM Beijing CPU utilization
FYI
Below are what we found out about CPU Management of Logstash.
.@orange.com<mailto:abdelmuhaimen.sea...@orange.com>;
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>
Subject: Re: [onap-discuss] OOM Beijing CPU utilization
Hi,
I have seen this 3 times from Dec to March - tracking this nodejs issue via
OOM-834 (not an OOM issue) - last saw it 27th Mar
] OOM Beijing CPU utilization
Hi,
I have seen this 3 times from Dec to March - tracking this nodejs issue via
OOM-834 (not an OOM issue) - last saw it 27th March under 1.8.10 (current
version) - but running helm 2.6.1 (current version 2.8.2)
https://jira.onap.org/browse/OOM-834<ht
Hi,
I have seen this 3 times from Dec to March - tracking this nodejs issue via
OOM-834 (not an OOM issue) - last saw it 27th March under 1.8.10 (current
version) - but running helm 2.6.1 (current version 2.8.2)
https://jira.onap.org/browse/OOM-834
Something in the infrastructure is
